Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 23;20(10):2541.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20102541.

Research Progress and Perspective on Drought Stress in Legumes: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Research Progress and Perspective on Drought Stress in Legumes: A Review

Muhammad Nadeem et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Climate change, food shortage, water scarcity, and population growth are some of the threatening challenges being faced in today's world. Drought stress (DS) poses a constant challenge for agricultural crops and has been considered a severe constraint for global agricultural productivity; its intensity and severity are predicted to increase in the near future. Legumes demonstrate high sensitivity to DS, especially at vegetative and reproductive stages. They are mostly grown in the dry areas and are moderately drought tolerant, but severe DS leads to remarkable production losses. The most prominent effects of DS are reduced germination, stunted growth, serious damage to the photosynthetic apparatus, decrease in net photosynthesis, and a reduction in nutrient uptake. To curb the catastrophic effect of DS in legumes, it is imperative to understand its effects, mechanisms, and the agronomic and genetic basis of drought for sustainable management. This review highlights the impact of DS on legumes, mechanisms, and proposes appropriate management approaches to alleviate the severity of water stress. In our discussion, we outline the influence of water stress on physiological aspects (such as germination, photosynthesis, water and nutrient uptake), growth parameters and yield. Additionally, mechanisms, various management strategies, for instance, agronomic practices (planting time and geometry, nutrient management), plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation, quantitative trait loci (QTLs), functional genomics and advanced strategies (CRISPR-Cas9) are also critically discussed. We propose that the integration of several approaches such as agronomic and biotechnological strategies as well as advanced genome editing tools is needed to develop drought-tolerant legume cultivars.

Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; QTLs; drought stress; drought tolerance; legumes; omics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of drought stress (DS) on plants and possible responses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of drought tolerance mechanism in legumes. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), Ca2+, ABA, and JA are activated under DS. DS induces biosynthesis of ABA and JA, which, in turn, up-regulate the transcription of ion transporter genes. Overexpression of transcription factors (WRKY, GmNACs, DREB, ZIP, AP2/ERF, MYB) has been reported under DS. ABA, abscisic acid; JA, Jasmonic acid.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the ‘omics’ approach for drought tolerance in legumes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic representation of an approach of genome editing (GE) with Cas9/sgRNA. First, the target gene is selected; sgRNAs are designed and synthesized using online tools. Generally, cloning of target sgRNA with Cas9 (or with its variant) is performed using a plant binary vector for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation into target plant species. Transformed plants are then selected for the presence of Cas9 and sgRNA, followed by PCR/RE genotyping. Finally, DNA sequencing is used for selecting the plants with the desired editing/mutation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xu J., Yuan Y., Xu Y., Zhang G., Guo X., Wu F., Wang Q., Rong T., Pan G., Cao M., et al. Identification of candidate genes for drought tolerance by whole-genome resequencing in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-83. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Negrão S., Schmöckel S.M., Tester M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann. Bot. 2017;119:1–11. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadeem M., Li J., Wang M., Shah L., Lu S., Wang X., Ma C. Unraveling field crops sensitivity to heat stress: Mechanisms, approaches, and future prospects. Agronomy. 2018;8:128. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8070128. - DOI
    1. Nadeem M., Li J., Yahya M., Wang M., Ali A., Cheng A., Wang X., Ma C. Grain legumes and fear of salt stress: Focus on mechanisms and management strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:799. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040799. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Golldack D., Li C., Mohan H., Probst N. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5:151. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources