Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 24;19(1):52.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0518-4.

Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery

Affiliations

Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery

Leonora E Long et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Surgeons use the Internet and social media to provide health information, promote their clinical practice, network with clinicians and researchers, and engage with journal clubs and online campaigns. While surgical patients are increasingly Internet-literate, the prevalence and purpose of searching for online health information vary among patient populations. We aimed to characterise patient and colorectal surgeon (CRS) use of the Internet and social media to seek health information.

Methods: Members of the Colorectal Society of Australia and New Zealand and patients under the care of CRS at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, were surveyed. Questions pertained to the types of information sought from the Internet, the platforms used to seek it, and the perceived utility of this information.

Results: Most CRS spent 2-6 h per week using the Internet for clinical purposes and an additional 2-6 h per week for research. 79% preferred literature databases as an information source. CRS most commonly directed patients to professional healthcare body websites. 59% of CRS use social media, mainly for socialising or networking. Nine percent of surgeons spent > 1 h per week on social media for clinical or research purposes. 72% of surgeons have a surgical practice website. 43% of patients searched the Internet for information on their doctor, and 75% of patients sought information on their symptoms or condition. However, 25% used health-specific websites, and 14% used professional healthcare body websites. Around 84% of patients found the information helpful, and 8% found it difficult to find information on the Internet. 12% of patients used social media to seek health information.

Conclusions: Colorectal surgery patients commonly find health information on the Internet but social media is not a prominent source of health information for patients or CRS.

Keywords: Australia; Colorectal surgery; Consumer health information; Internet; New Zealand; Social media; Surgeons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Purposes of Internet Use Among Colorectal Surgeons. n = 94

References

    1. Wexner SD, Petrucci AM, Brady RR, Ennis-O'Connor M, Fitzgerald JE, Mayol J. Social media in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2017;19(2):105–114. doi: 10.1111/codi.13572. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Logghe HJ, McFadden CL, Tully NJ, Jones C. History of social media in surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(4):233–239. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604250. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curry E, Li X, Nguyen J, Matzkin E. Prevalence of internet and social media usage in orthopedic surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2014;6(3):5483. doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5483. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown J, Ryan C, Harris A. How doctors view and use social media: a national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e267. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3589. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosselmann CM, Griffiths B, Gallagher HJ, Matzel KE, Brady RRW. Social media use in German visceral surgeons: a cross-sectional study of a national cohort. Color Dis. 2018;20(2):144–149. doi: 10.1111/codi.13839. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources