Increasing species sampling in chelicerate genomic-scale datasets provides support for monophyly of Acari and Arachnida
- PMID: 31127117
 - PMCID: PMC6534568
 - DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10244-7
 
Increasing species sampling in chelicerate genomic-scale datasets provides support for monophyly of Acari and Arachnida
Erratum in
- 
  
  Author Correction: Increasing species sampling in chelicerate genomic-scale datasets provides support for monophyly of Acari and Arachnida.Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 1;10(1):4534. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12259-6. Nat Commun. 2019. PMID: 31575855 Free PMC article.
 
Abstract
Chelicerates are a diverse group of arthropods, represented by such forms as predatory spiders and scorpions, parasitic ticks, humic detritivores, and marine sea spiders (pycnogonids) and horseshoe crabs. Conflicting phylogenetic relationships have been proposed for chelicerates based on both morphological and molecular data, the latter usually not recovering arachnids as a clade and instead finding horseshoe crabs nested inside terrestrial Arachnida. Here, using genomic-scale datasets and analyses optimised for countering systematic error, we find strong support for monophyletic Acari (ticks and mites), which when considered as a single group represent the most biodiverse chelicerate lineage. In addition, our analysis recovers marine forms (sea spiders and horseshoe crabs) as the successive sister groups of a monophyletic lineage of terrestrial arachnids, suggesting a single colonisation of land within Chelicerata and the absence of wholly secondarily marine arachnid orders.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
              
              
              
              
                
                
                
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    
- Penney D. Does the fossil record of spiders track that of their principal prey, the insects? Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 2003;94:275–281. doi: 10.1017/S0263593300000675. - DOI
 
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
