Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 25;20(5):1487-1495.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1487.

Assessment of Unmet Supportive Care Needs in Haematological Cancer Survivors

Affiliations

Assessment of Unmet Supportive Care Needs in Haematological Cancer Survivors

Theocharis I Konstantinidis et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Background: Health needs assessment is crucial for the provision of individualized nursing care. However, many patients report a significant number of unmet needs. The aim of the present study was the assessment of self-reported unmet supportive care needs among haematological cancer survivors in Greece. Methods: 102 patients (mean age 66.2 years old) diagnosed with haematological cancer were included in a cross-sectional study, conducted in two major Greek public hospitals, between October and December 2016. Patients’ needs were assessed using the ‘Needs Evaluation Questionnaire’ (NEQ). Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software for Windows. Alfa-level (p-value) selected was 5%, bootstrap techniques were used for 95% CI estimation, χ2 was used for differentiation control and Kuder-Richardson coefficient for reliability score assessment (ρ = 0.922). Results: Patients reported higher needs levels “to receive less commiseration from other people” (48%), “more information about my future condition” (44.1%) and “to feel more useful within my family” (42.2%). In contrast, patients reported lower levels to the needs “to speak with a spiritual advisor” (11.8%), “to have more help with eating, dressing and going to the bathroom” (13.7%) and “better attention from nurses” (18.6%). The mean score of satisfied patients (≥8/10) was 8.9 (SD 1.7). Associations between socio-demographic, hospitalization data and unmet needs groups were identified. The less satisfied patients (<8/10) reported more informational needs about their diagnosis and their future condition (p-value=0.002), about their exams and treatments (p-value=0.001), communicative (p-value <0.001), assistance and treatment (p-value<0.001) and hospital infrastructure (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Various factors seem to be associated to the prevalent unmet care needs among haematological cancer patients. Establishing NEQ as a routine needs assessment tool could aid health professionals to early identify patients’ needs in a busy clinical setting and implement more individualized and patient-centered quality care.

Keywords: Haematological cancer; needs evaluation questionnaire; unmet needs; supportive interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of Unmet Needs of NEQ in Groups (at Least One Unmet Need in Each Group)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bahrami M, Arbon P. How do nurses assess quality of life of cancer patients in oncology wards and palliative settings? Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:212–9. - PubMed
    1. Boland EG, Boland JW, Ezaydi Y, et al. Holistic needs assessment in advanced, intensively treated multiple myeloma patients. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:2615. - PubMed
    1. Bonacchi A, Toccafondi A, Mambrini A, et al. Complementary needs behind complementary therapies in cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2015;24:1124–0. - PubMed
    1. Bonacchi A, Di Miceli S, Lippi D, Muraca MG, Miccinesi G. Unmet needs of Italian cancer patients in different stages of the disease and care process. Tumori. 2018;104:285–1. - PubMed
    1. Boyes AW, Clinton-McHarg T, Waller AE, et al. Prevalence and correlates of the unmet supportive care needs of individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:507–4. - PubMed