Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review
- PMID: 31129474
- DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024
Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review
Abstract
Introduction: Frequent users of healthcare services are a small proportion of patients with disproportionately high healthcare usage. A wide array of factors, including psychological distress, leads to frequent use of healthcare services. There is no existing synthesis of research on frequent use and psychological distress in the general population. This scoping review aimed to compare psychological distress between frequent and non-frequent users and to examine the association between psychological distress and frequent use of healthcare services in primary care and emergency department (ED) services.
Methods: A scoping review was performed following the five steps defined by Arksey and O'Malley. A search strategy was developed with an information specialist in five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for articles in English published between 1963 and October 2018. To be included, studies had to be quantitative, have taken place in a primary care or ED setting, have documented frequent use, and have measured psychological distress in patients. Two team members independently gathered the data for each of the included studies. Results were collated, summarized, and reported using narrative synthesis.
Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Psychological distress in primary care is generally higher in frequent users, and increased psychological distress scores are associated with frequent use. Both studies set in EDs reported noteworthy findings, stating that frequent users reported higher levels of psychological distress and that psychological distress was associated with frequent use.
Conclusion: Psychological distress is prevalent in frequent users and has a significant association with frequent use. As such, psychological distress should be evaluated by physicians to prevent or reduce frequent use and to identify candidates for interventions.
Keywords: Emergency department; Frequent use; Primary care; Psychological distress.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Experience of being a frequent user of primary care and emergency department services: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e033351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033351. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32912938 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Factors associated with frequent use of emergency-department services in a geriatric population: a systematic review.BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1197-9. BMC Geriatr. 2019. PMID: 31277582 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic pain and frequent use of emergency department: A systematic review.Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):358-363. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158492. Epub 2019 Oct 14. Am J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31706663
-
Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31129592 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Stress Measurement in Primary Care: Conceptual Issues, Barriers, Resources, and Recommendations for Study.Psychosom Med. 2022 Apr 1;84(3):267-275. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001051. Psychosom Med. 2022. PMID: 35067657 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does living close to a petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of the COVID-19 lockdown?PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0249058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249058. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33730077 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Nursing Effect of Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor.Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 23;2022:1569656. doi: 10.1155/2022/1569656. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. Retraction in: Biomed Res Int. 2024 Jan 9;2024:9851451. doi: 10.1155/2024/9851451. PMID: 35655483 Free PMC article. Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
CONECT-6: a case-finding tool to identify patients with complex health needs.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06154-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33596929 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a national Distress Brief Intervention: a multi-agency service to provide connected, compassionate support for people in distress.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12469-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40181458 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous