Kinetics of biofilm formation by pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms under conditions that mimic the poultry, meat, and egg processing industries
- PMID: 31129476
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.04.012
Kinetics of biofilm formation by pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms under conditions that mimic the poultry, meat, and egg processing industries
Abstract
Pathogens and spoilage microorganisms can develop multispecies biofilms on food contact surfaces; however, few studies have been focused on evaluated mixed biofilms of these microorganisms. Therefore this study investigated the biofilm development by pathogenic (Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica Enteritidis and Typhimurium serotypes) and spoilage (Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) microorganisms onto stainless-steel (SS) and polypropylene B (PP) coupons; under conditions that mimic the dairy, meat, and egg processing industry. Biofilms were developed in TSB with 10% chicken egg yolk (TSB + EY), TSB with 10% meat extract (TSB + ME) and whole milk (WM) onto SS and PP. Each tube was inoculated with 25 μL of each bacteria and then incubated at 9 or 25 °C, with enumeration at 1, 48, 120, 180 and 240 h. Biofilms were visualized by epifluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Biofilm development occurred at different phases, depending on the incubation conditions. In the reversible adhesion, the cell density of each bacteria was between 1.43 and 6.08 Log10 CFU/cm2 (p < 0.05). Moreover, significant reductions in bacteria appeared at 9 °C between 1 and 48 h of incubation. Additionally, the constant multiplication of bacteria in the biofilm occurred at 25 °C between 48 and 180 h of incubation, with increments of 2.08 Log10 CFU/cm2 to S. Typhimurium. Population establishment was observed between 48 and 180 h and 180-240 h incubation, depending on the environmental conditions (25 and 9 °C, respectively). For example, in TSB + ME at 25 °C, S. Typhimurium, P aeruginosa, and L. monocytogenes showed no statistical differences in the amounts between 48 and 180 h incubation. The dispersion phase was identified for L. monocytogenes and B. cereus at 25 °C. Epifluorescence microscopy and SEM allowed visualizing the bacteria and extracellular polymeric substances at the different biofilm stages. In conclusion, pathogens and spoilage microorganisms developed monospecies with higher cellular densities than multiespecies biofilms. In multispecies biofilms, the time to reach each biofilm phase varied is depending on environmental factors. Cell count decrements of 1.12-2.44 Log10 CFU/cm2 occurred at 48 and 240 h and were most notable in the biofilms developed at 9 °C. Additionally, cell density reached by each microorganism was different, P. aeruginosa and Salmonella were the dominant microorganisms in the biofilms while B. cereus showed the lower densities until undetectable levels.
Keywords: Food contact surfaces; Food industry; Multispecies biofilms.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Dynamics of biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on stainless steel under mono-species and mixed-culture simulated fish processing conditions and chemical disinfection challenges.Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Feb 21;267:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 19. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 29275280
-
Resistance of pathogenic bacteria on the surface of stainless steel depending on attachment form and efficacy of chemical sanitizers.Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Feb 15;153(3):465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.017. Epub 2011 Dec 19. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 22225983
-
Interactions between spoilage bacteria in tri-species biofilms developed under simulated meat processing conditions.Food Microbiol. 2019 Sep;82:515-522. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 22. Food Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31027813
-
Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods.Meat Sci. 2014 Jul;97(3):298-309. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 May 23. Meat Sci. 2014. PMID: 23747091 Review.
-
Microbial biofilm: A matter of grave concern for human health and food industry.J Basic Microbiol. 2021 May;61(5):380-395. doi: 10.1002/jobm.202000678. Epub 2021 Feb 22. J Basic Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33615511 Review.
Cited by
-
Natural Strategies as Potential Weapons against Bacterial Biofilms.Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;12(10):1618. doi: 10.3390/life12101618. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36295053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Use of Natural Methods to Control Foodborne Biofilms.Pathogens. 2022 Dec 27;12(1):45. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010045. Pathogens. 2022. PMID: 36678393 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biofilm-Forming Ability of Microbacterium lacticum and Staphylococcus capitis Considering Physicochemical and Topographical Surface Properties.Foods. 2021 Mar 13;10(3):611. doi: 10.3390/foods10030611. Foods. 2021. PMID: 33805651 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative and Compositional Study of Monospecies Biofilms of Spoilage Microorganisms in the Meat Industry and Their Interaction in the Development of Multispecies Biofilms.Microorganisms. 2019 Dec 5;7(12):655. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120655. Microorganisms. 2019. PMID: 31817368 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging Flow Cytometry to Study Biofilm-Associated Microbial Aggregates.Molecules. 2021 Nov 24;26(23):7096. doi: 10.3390/molecules26237096. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 34885675 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous