Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 24;9(5):e026399.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026399.

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of strengths model case management (SMCM) with Chinese mental health service users in Hong Kong

Samson Tse  1 , Sau Man Catalina Ng  2 , Wing Yan Winnie Yuen  1 , Sadaaki Fukui  3 , Richard J Goscha  4 , Wann Ka Iris Lo  1
Affiliations

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of strengths model case management (SMCM) with Chinese mental health service users in Hong Kong

Samson Tse et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Strengths-based approaches mobilise individual and environmental resources that can facilitate the recovery of people with mental illness. Strengths model case management (SMCM), developed by Rapp and Goscha through collaborative efforts at the University of Kansas, offers a structured and innovative intervention. As evidence of the effectiveness of strengths-based interventions come from Western studies, which lacked rigorous research design or failed to assure fidelity to the model, we aim to fill these gaps and conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of SMCM for individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong.

Methods and analysis: This will be an RCT of SMCM. Assuming a medium intervention effect (Cohen's d=0.60) with 30% missing data (including dropouts), 210 service users aged 18 years or above will be recruited from three community mental health centres. They will be randomly assigned to SMCM groups (intervention) or SMILE groups (control) in a 1:1 ratio. The SMCM groups will receive strengths model interventions from case workers, whereas the SMILE groups will receive generic care from case workers with an attention placebo. The case workers will all be embedded in the community centres and will be required to provide a session with service users in both groups at least once every fortnight. There will be two groups of case workers for the intervention and control groups, respectively. The effectiveness of the SMCM will be compared between the two groups of service users with outcomes at baseline, 6 and 12 months after recruitment. Functional outcomes will also be reported by case workers. Data on working alliances and goal attainment will be collected from individual case workers. Qualitative evaluation will be conducted to identify the therapeutic ingredients and conditions leading to positive outcomes. Trained outcome assessors will be blind to the group allocation.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Hong Kong has been obtained (HRECNCF: EA1703078). The results will be disseminated to service users and their families via the media, to healthcare professionals via professional training and meetings and to researchers via conferences and publications.

Trial registration number: 12617001435370; Pre-results.

Keywords: clinical trials; mental health; organisation of health services; protocols and guidelines; psychiatry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Salient concepts of strengths model case management (modified from Rapp and Goscha, p50)[13].
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram reflecting the flow of participants through the current study. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; SMCM, strengths model case management.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fukui S, Shimizu Y, Rapp CA. A Cross-cultural study of recovery for people with psychiatric disabilities between U.S. and Japan. Community Ment Health J 2012;48:804–12. 10.1007/s10597-012-9513-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lam LC, Wong CS, Wang MJ, et al. . Prevalence, psychosocial correlates and service utilization of depressive and anxiety disorders in Hong Kong: the Hong Kong Mental Morbidity Survey (HKMMS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2015;50:1379–88. 10.1007/s00127-015-1014-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang WC, Wong CS, Lam LC, et al. . Prevalence, psychosocial and physical health correlates of psychotic disorders in Hong Kong: the Hong Kong Mental Health Morbidity Survey. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2015;41:S135.
    1. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, et al. . Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;382:1575–86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloom D, Cafiero E, Jané-Llopis E, et al. . The global economic burden of non-communicable diseases. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc 2012.

Publication types

MeSH terms