Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol
- PMID: 31129602
- PMCID: PMC6538028
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028647
Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol
Abstract
Introduction: The ageing of the population represents a significant challenge for aged care in Australia and in many other countries internationally. In an environment of increasing resource constraints, new methods, techniques and evaluative frameworks are needed to support resource allocation decisions that maximise the quality of life and well-being of older people. Economic evaluation offers a rigorous, systematical and transparent framework for measuring quality and efficiency, but there is currently no composite mechanism for incorporating older people's values into the measurement and valuation of quality of life for quality assessment and economic evaluation. In addition, to date relatively few economic evaluations have been conducted in aged care despite the large potential benefits associated with their application in this sector. This study will generate a new preference based older person-specific quality of life instrument designed for application in economic evaluation and co-created from its inception with older people.
Methods and analysis: A candidate descriptive system for the new instrument will be developed by synthesising the findings from a series of in-depth qualitative interviews with 40 older people currently in receipt of aged care services about the salient factors which make up their quality of life. The candidate descriptive system will be tested for construct validity, practicality and reliability with a new independent sample of older people (n=100). Quality of life state valuation tasks using best worst scaling (a form of discrete choice experiment) will then be undertaken with a representative sample of older people currently receiving aged care services across five Australian states (n=500). A multinomial (conditional) logistical framework will be used to analyse responses and generate a scoring algorithm for the new preference-based instrument.
Ethics and dissemination: The new quality of life instrument will have wide potential applicability in assessing the cost effectiveness of new service innovations and for quality assessment across the spectrum of ageing and aged care. Results will be disseminated in ageing, quality of life research and health economics journals and through professional conferences and policy forums. This study has been reviewed by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia and has ethics approval (Application ID: 201644).
Keywords: aged care; dementia; instruments; older people; quality of life; utility.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Developing a dementia-specific preference--based quality of life measure (AD-5D) in Australia: a valuation study protocol.BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e018996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018996. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29358437 Free PMC article.
-
A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care-study protocol.BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 25;4(6):e005788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 24965918 Free PMC article.
-
Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):e038626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038626. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33087374 Free PMC article.
-
A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):781-801. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00512-4. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019. PMID: 31512086 Review.
-
Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(10):1-93, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9100. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15774233 Review.
Cited by
-
A qualitative exploration of the content and face validity of preference-based measures within the context of dementia.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 11;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01425-w. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32527264 Free PMC article.
-
The IMPART (IMproving PAlliative care in Residential aged care using Telehealth) trial: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol.BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06061-x. BMC Geriatr. 2025. PMID: 40604592 Free PMC article.
-
Towards a unifying caring life-course theory for better self-care and caring solutions: A discussion paper.J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jan;78(1):e6-e20. doi: 10.1111/jan.14887. Epub 2021 May 18. J Adv Nurs. 2022. PMID: 34002886 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of 29 self-report instruments for assessing quality of life in older adults receiving aged care services.BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e050892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050892. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34794991 Free PMC article.
-
Examining interrater agreement between self-report and proxy-report responses for the quality of life-aged care consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 4;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00705-z. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 38436803 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2014. Cat. no. AUS 178. Canberra: AIHW, 2017.
-
- Productivity Commission. Caring for older Australians. Research report. Canberra, 2011.
-
- Department of Health & Aging. Living Longer, Living Better. Canberra, 2012.
-
- Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, et al. . Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. 2nd edn UK: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources