Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 May 25;14(1):55.
doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0604-3.

Age-specific 1-year mortality rates after hip fracture based on the populations in mainland China between the years 2000 and 2018: a systematic analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Age-specific 1-year mortality rates after hip fracture based on the populations in mainland China between the years 2000 and 2018: a systematic analysis

Zhiyong Cui et al. Arch Osteoporos. .

Abstract

We used statistical approaches to calculate 1-year mortality rates and reveal the relationship between age and the 1-year mortality rate after hip fracture based on data from mainland China between the years 2000 and 2018.

Introduction: Data on the 1-year mortality rates after hip fracture in mainland China remain limited and localized. We aimed to analyze the 1-year mortality rates and reveal the variations in 1-year mortality by age after hip fracture based on data from mainland China.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM-SinoMed for all relevant articles in English or Chinese to estimate the 1-year mortality rates after hip fracture in mainland China. A random-effects meta-analysis model was fitted to pool the overall 1-year mortality rates. A multilevel mixed-effects meta-regression model was developed. Based on the final model, the age-specific 1-year mortality rates after hip fracture in mainland China were generated.

Results: The pooled estimate of the 1-year mortality rate was 13.96% after hip fracture (95% CI 12.26 to 15.86%), 17.47% after femoral intertrochanteric fracture (95% CI 14.29 to 21.20%), and 9.83% after femoral neck fracture (95% CI 6.96 to 13.72%) between the years 2000 and 2018. We found that the 1-year mortality rates ranged from 2.65% (95% CI 1.76 to 3.99%) in those aged 50~54 years to 28.91% (95% CI 24.23 to 34.30%) in those aged 95~99 years after hip fracture; ranged from 1.73% (95% CI 0.58 to 4.99%) in those aged 50~54 years to 50.11% (95% CI 46.03% to 53.97%) in those aged 95~99 years after femoral intertrochanteric fracture; and ranged from 1.66% (95% CI 1.31 to 2.11%) in those aged 60~64 years to 37.71% (95% CI 27.92 to 48.63%) in those aged 95~99 years after femoral neck fracture.

Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we calculated the 1-year mortality rate after hip fracture in mainland China and found that this rate was lower than that in most countries. We also estimated the age-specific mortality rates for different age groups after hip fracture. These findings will be beneficial for the prevention and treatment of hip fracture in mainland China.

Keywords: China; Hip fracture; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of selection of cohort studies of 1-year mortality after hip fracture in mainland China following the MOOSE guideline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A map of study locations included in the systematic review in mainland China. Dots indicate the study locations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Age-specific 1-year mortality after hip fracture, femoral intertrochanteric fracture, and femoral neck fracture based on the data points from the included studies, with 95% confidence intervals. Note: The size of each bubble is proportional to the sample size. Regression lines are based on only or very few data points at younger (< 70 years) and older (> 90 years) ages. Overall, there were 75 data points for constructing the relationship between age and 1-year mortality after hip fracture, 27 data points for femoral intertrochanteric fracture, and 12 data points for femoral neck fracture
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of estimated age-specific 1-year mortality rates between femoral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral neck fracture, with 95% confidence intervals

References

    1. Tosteson AN, Gottlieb DJ, Radley DC, Fisher ES, Melton LJ., 3rd Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:1463–1472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks E, Reeves GK, Beral V, Balkwill A, Liu B, Roddam A, for the Million Women Study Collaborators Hip fracture incidence in relation to age, menopausal status, and age at menopause: prospective analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey EV, et al. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:2239–2256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karres J, Kieviet N, Eerenberg JP, Vrouenraets BC. Predicting early mortality after hip fracture surgery: the hip fracture estimator of mortality Amsterdam. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:27–33. - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Wang Z, Xiao W. Risk factors for mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures: a meta-analysis of 18 studies. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30:323–330. - PubMed

Publication types