Conjunctival flora in anophthalmic patients: microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity
- PMID: 31131234
- PMCID: PMC6520282
- DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.05.10
Conjunctival flora in anophthalmic patients: microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity
Abstract
Aim: To identify the spectrum and susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganisms from conjunctival flora of anophthalmic patients.
Methods: A cross-sectional clinical study including 60 patients with unilateral anophthalmia. Patients with use of antibiotic drops in their socket during the last month were also included. From each patient, three microbiological samples were taken from the lower conjunctival sac (healthy eye, pre-prosthesis, and retro-prosthesis space of socket). The 180 samples obtained were cultured. Isolates were identified and their antibiotic sensitivities were determined.
Results: A total of 251 isolates were recovered (62 isolates from healthy eye, 93 from pre-prosthesis, and 96 from retro-prosthesis space). The most common organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis, in both healthy eyes (64.5%) and sockets (45.5%). Altogether, coagulase-positive Staphylococci, Streptococci, and Gram-negative bacteria accounted for less than 15% of isolates in healthy eyes and more than 35% in sockets. Regarding the antibiotic sensitivities, there were no significant differences between isolates from sockets and healthy eyes. Nine patients recognized the use of self-prescribed antibiotic drops in their socket. In the healthy eyes of these subjects, Gram-positive microorganisms showed significantly greater resistance to aminoglycosides and tetracycline.
Conclusion: Sockets of anophthalmic patients show a greater number of pathogens compared to healthy eyes. The use of antibiotic drops in the socket promotes a resistant flora not only in the socket but also in the healthy eye. Quinolones and macrolides may be better therapeutic options than aminoglycosides for treating conjunctivitis of anophthalmic sockets, since these antibiotics are less active against Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; conjunctival dysbiosis; microflora; ocular prosthesis; socket.
Similar articles
-
Study of conjunctival flora in anophthalmic patients: influence on the comfort of the socket.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1669-1679. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3708-8. Epub 2017 Jun 10. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28601909
-
Novel point-of-care biomarkers of the dry anophthalmic socket syndrome: tear film osmolarity and matrix metalloproteinase 9 immunoassay.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;261(3):821-831. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05895-0. Epub 2022 Nov 11. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36357674 Free PMC article.
-
Conjunctival cytologic features in anophthalmic patients wearing an ocular prosthesis.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;24(4):290-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181788dff. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008. PMID: 18645434
-
Microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity in endophthalmitis: a 25-year review.Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1634-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Apr 2. Ophthalmology. 2014. PMID: 24702755 Review.
-
Anophthalmic Socket Syndrome: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 6;15:3267-3281. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S325652. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34393477 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Elevated levels of Merkel cell polyoma virus in the anophthalmic conjunctiva.Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92642-w. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34321490 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiological evaluation of conjunctival anopthalmic flora after using digital 3D-printed ocular prosthesis compared to conventional one: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03746-w. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 38110937 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Susceptibility of Ocular Surface Bacteria to Various Antibiotic Agents in a Romanian Ophthalmology Clinic.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;13(22):3409. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223409. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37998545 Free PMC article.
-
Conjunctival sac microbiome in anophthalmic patients: Flora diversity and the impact of ocular prosthesis materials.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Mar 7;13:1117673. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1117673. eCollection 2023. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 36960044 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro evaluation of the effect of different disinfectants on the biofilm of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus formed on acrylic ocular prostheses.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0240116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240116. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33044989 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39(1):47–52. - PubMed
-
- Dave SB, Toma HS, Kim SJ. Changes in ocular flora in eyes exposed to ophthalmic antibiotics. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):937–941. - PubMed
-
- Christensen JN, Fahmy JA. The bacterial flora of the conjunctival anophthalmic socket in glass prosthesis-carriers. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1974;52(6):801–809. - PubMed
-
- Miller SD, Smith RE, Dippe DW, Lacey DR, Abel M. Bacteriology of the socket in patients with prostheses. Can J Ophthalmol. 1976;11(2):126–129. - PubMed
-
- Patillon JC, Rousse C, Gauthier C, Guyot J, Barbier A, Royer J, Michel-Briand Y. Bacterial flora of the conjunctiva in enucleated subjects. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1978;78(11):781–787. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources