Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;33(6):e22918.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.22918. Epub 2019 May 26.

CircRNA expression profile of bovine placentas in late gestation with aberrant SCNT fetus

Affiliations

CircRNA expression profile of bovine placentas in late gestation with aberrant SCNT fetus

Xiaohu Su et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Backgrounds: One of the limitations of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) strategy to generate genetically modified offspring is the low birth rate. Placental dysfunction is one of the causes of abortion. Circular RNA (circRNA) is noncoding RNA which functions as microRNA (miRNA) sponges in biological processes.

Methods: Two aberrant pregnant placenta (aberrant group, AG) and three normal pregnant placenta (normal group, NG) during late gestation (180-210 days) with bovine SCNT fetus were collected for high-throughput sequencing and analyzed. The host genes of differentially expressed (DE) circRNAs were predicted. And the microRNAs (miRNAs) which could interact with DE circRNAs were analyzed. Then, the expressional level of partial DE circRNAs and corresponding host genes was verified through qRT-PCR. At last, the function of host genes was analyzed through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).

Results: Altogether 123 differentially expressed circRNAs between two groups were identified, which were found related to 60 host genes and 32 miRNAs. The top 10 upregulated circRNAs were bta_circ_0012985, bta_circ_0013071, bta_circ_0013074, bta_circ_0016024, bta_circ_0013068, bta_circ_0008816, bta_circ_0012982, bta_circ_0013072, bta_circ_0019285, and bta_circ_0013067. The top 10 downregulated circRNAs were bta_circ_0024234, bta_circ_0017528, bta_circ_0008077, bta_circ_0003222, bta_circ_0007500, bta_circ_0020328, bta_circ_0011001, bta_circ_0016364, bta_circ_0008839, and bta_circ_0016049. The qRT-PCR results showed consistent trend with sequencing analysis result, while host genes had no statistic difference. The GO and KEGG analyses of the host genes suggested that abnormal circRNA expression may play multiple roles in placental structure and dysfunction.

Conclusion: The abnormal circRNA expression may be one of reasons of placental dysfunction, leads to abortion of bovine SCNT fetus.

Keywords: aberrant development; bovine; circular RNAs; placenta; somatic cell nuclear transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of genomic location and classification of circRNAs expressed in bovine late gestational placenta. A, The chromosome distributions of circRNAs. B, Classification of circRNAs. C, Distribution of exon composition. AG: abnormal group; NG: normal group
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differential expression of circRNAs between AG and NG A, Hierarchical cluster analysis of circRNAs. The color scale of the strips runs from blue (low relative expression) through black (medium relative expression) to yellow (high relative expression). B, Volcano plots visualize the differentially expressed (DE) circRNAs. The green and red plots represent the significantly DE circRNAs (FC ≥ 2.0, P value <0.05). C, Number of upregulated and downregulated circRNAs of DE circRNAs. D, Validation of DE circRNA expression level by qRT‐PCR. Eight DE circRNAs (left) and their host genes (right) were selected to validate the expression level (N = 3. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edwards JL, Schrick FN, McCracken MD, et al. Cloning adult farm animals: a review of the possibilities and problems associated with somatic cell nuclear transfer. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003;50:113‐123. - PubMed
    1. Wells DN. Animal cloning: problems and prospects. Rev Sci Tech. 2005;24:251‐264. - PubMed
    1. Wang F, Kou Z, Zhang Y, Gao S. Dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation in the first cell cycle of cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 2007;77:1007‐1016. - PubMed
    1. Palmieri C, Loi P, Ptak G, Della Salda L. Review paper: a review of the pathology of abnormal placentae of somatic cell nuclear transfer clone pregnancies in cattle, sheep, and mice. Vet Pathol. 2008;45:865‐880. - PubMed
    1. Pozor MA, Sheppard B, Hinrichs K, et al. Placental abnormalities in equine pregnancies generated by SCNT from one donor horse. Theriogenology. 2016;86:1573‐1582. - PubMed