Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;40(7):900-910.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002298.

Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review

Floris Heutink et al. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: By discussing the design, findings, strengths, and weaknesses of available studies investigating the influence of angular insertion depth on speech perception, we intend to summarize the current status of evidence; and using evidence based conclusions, possibly contribute to the determination of the optimal cochlear implant (CI) electrode position.

Data sources: Our search strategy yielded 10,877 papers. PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to June 1, 2018. Both keywords and free-text terms, related to patient population, predictive factor, and outcome measurements were used. There were no restrictions in languages or year of publication.

Study selection: Seven articles were included in this systematic review. Articles eligible for inclusion: (a) investigated cochlear implantation of any CI system in adults with post-lingual onset of deafness and normal cochlear anatomy; (b) investigated the relationship between angular insertion depth and speech perception; (c) measured angular insertion depth on imaging; and (d) measured speech perception at, or beyond 1-year post-activation.

Data extraction and synthesis: In included studies; quality was judged low-to-moderate and risk of bias, evaluated using a Quality-in-Prognostic-Studies-tool (QUIPS), was high. Included studies were too heterogeneous to perform meta-analyses, therefore, effect estimates of the individual studies are presented. Six out of seven included studies found no effect of angular insertion depth on speech perception.

Conclusion: All included studies are characterized by methodological flaws, and therefore, evidence-based conclusions regarding the influence of angular insertion depth cannot be drawn to date.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have a personal conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Method for angular insertion depth measurement on Computed Tomography (CT)-scan of an implanted electrode array with 16 electrode contacts. With in a three-dimensional cylindrical coordinate system all spatial information of the cochlea and an implant is measurable. By consensus this cochlear framework is defined by a plane of rotation through the basal turn of the cochlea and a z-axis through the modiolus. This can be applied on CT of the temporal bone by making a multiplanar reconstruction along the basal turn of the cochlea (AC), and placing the z-axis through the center of the cochlea; the modiolus (M). A, An angular measurement of the insertion depth can then be made by indicating the center of the round window (RW) and the tip of the electrode array (dark grey circle). B, A 0 degree reference line between the modiolus (M) and the middle of the round window (RW), and a perpendicular line from the modiolus on the 0 degree reference line is drawn (cross). C, An angle is drawn (in white) from the modiolus over the 0 degree reference line, and through the most apical point the tip of the electrode array (dark grey circle). In this example the angular insertion depth of the most apical electrode contact is 368.3 degrees; the sum of four quadrants equal to 360 degrees plus the measured white angle equal to 8.3 degrees.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Flow diagram of the study selection.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

References

    1. Baskent D, Shannon RV. Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117 (3 pt 1):1405–1416. - PubMed
    1. Faulkner A, Rosen S, Norman C. The right information may matter more than frequency-place alignment: simulations of frequency-aligned and upward shifting cochlear implant processors for a shallow electrode array insertion. Ear Hear 2006; 27:139–152. - PubMed
    1. Gani M, Valentini G, Sigrist A, et al. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007; 8:69–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suhling MC, Ketten DR, Salcher R, et al. The impact of electrode array length on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37:1006–1015. - PubMed
    1. Causon A, Verschuur C, Newman TA. A retrospective analysis of the contribution of reported factors in cochlear implantation on hearing preservation outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36:1137–1145. - PubMed

Publication types