Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;133(6):1247-1254.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266.

Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause

Alessandra J Ainsworth  1 , Sarah C Baumgarten, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Celine M Vachon, Amy L Weaver, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
Affiliations

Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause

Alessandra J Ainsworth et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function.

Methods: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation).

Results: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0%, 25.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause.

Conclusions: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure

The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Summary of subject identification.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Westhoff C, Davis A. Tubal sterilization: focus on the U.S. experience. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):913–22. - PubMed
    1. Bartz D, Greenberg JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(1):23–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker JL, Powell CB, Chen LM, Carter J, Bae Jump VL, Parker LP, et al. Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2015;27(10):29321. - PubMed
    1. Lessard-Anderson CR, Handlogten KS, Molitor RJ, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Weaver AL, et al. Effect of tubal sterilization technique on risk of serous epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):423–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer. A prospective study. Jama. 1993;270(23):2813–8. - PubMed

Publication types