Cryoglobulins Today: Detection and Immunologic Characteristics of 1,675 Positive Samples From 13,439 Patients Obtained Over Six Years
- PMID: 31136095
- DOI: 10.1002/art.41003
Cryoglobulins Today: Detection and Immunologic Characteristics of 1,675 Positive Samples From 13,439 Patients Obtained Over Six Years
Abstract
Objective: Cryoglobulins are cold-precipitating immunoglobulins. Through progress in techniques, we undertook this study to update information on the biologic characteristics of cryoglobulins in a very large population.
Methods: A cohort of 13,439 patients was tested for cryoglobulins from January 2010 to December 2016. The analysis included cryoglobulin isotype, clonality, concentration, and IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) in cryoprecipitate, as well as serum complement and RF. Markers of gammopathy, viral infection, and autoimmunity were also investigated.
Results: Of the 13,439 patients, 1,675 (12.5%) tested positive for cryoglobulins: 155 patients (9.3%) with type I, 788 (47%) with type II, and 732 (43.7%) with type III cryoglobulins. Nine percent of patients who were retested after initially testing negative for cryoglobulins showed a positive result on a follow-up test (196 of the 2,213 retested patients). In type I cryoglobulins, IgM was more frequent but occurred at lower concentrations than IgG. Mixed cryoglobulins were found in 34.8% of the tested patients who were positive for hepatitis C virus and <5% of those who were positive for hepatitis B virus or HIV. Of the patients with anti-double-stranded DNA, anti-SSA, or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies, 25.4% tested positive for mixed cryoglobulins, with type III occurring more frequently than type II. Both cryoprecipitate and serum were RF-positive in 21.6% of type II and 10.1% of type III cryoglobulins. A decrease of C4, with or without accompanying decreases of C3 and CH50, was found in 23.6% of cryoglobulin samples.
Conclusion: Obtained with the use of modern assays, our findings from this very large collection of cryoglobulins provide an update on cryoglobulin distribution and characteristics, with minimal selection bias. Despite strict preanalytical conditions, a negative finding for the presence of cryoglobulin must be confirmed in a second sample. RF activity and complement decreases were rarely detected.
© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.
Comment in
-
Reply.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;72(11):1956-1957. doi: 10.1002/art.41433. Epub 2020 Sep 22. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020. PMID: 32648663 No abstract available.
-
Frequency and Results of Cryoglobulin Retesting in 4,963 Patients: Comment on the Article by Kolopp-Sarda et al.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;72(11):1955-1956. doi: 10.1002/art.41434. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020. PMID: 32648698 No abstract available.
References
-
- Wintrobe M, Buell M. Hyperproteinemia associated with multiple myeloma. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1933;52:156-65.
-
- Meltzer M, Franklin EC, Elias K, McCluskey RT, Cooper N. Cryoglobulinemia-a clinical and laboratory study. II. Cryoglobulins with rheumatoid factor activity. Am J Med 1966;40:837-56.
-
- Brouet JC, Clauvel JP, Danon F, Klein M, Seligmann M. Biologic and clinical significance of cryoglobulins: a report of 86 cases. Am J Med 1974;57:775-88.
-
- Gorevic PD, Frangione B. Mixed cryoglobulinemia cross-reactive idiotypes: implications for the relationship of MC to rheumatic and lymphoproliferative diseases. Semin Hematol 1991;28:79-94.
-
- Sargur R, White P, Egner W. Cryoglobulin evaluation: best practice? Ann Clin Biochem 2009;47:8-16.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous