Racial Disparities in Cleft Palate Repair
- PMID: 31136493
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005650
Racial Disparities in Cleft Palate Repair
Abstract
Background: Various factors can influence outcomes in cleft palate care. This study sought to determine the impact of race on admissions, hospital costs, and short-term complications in cleft palate repair.
Methods: Cleft palate operations were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database data, from 2000 to 2009. Data were combed for demographics, perioperatives, complications, and hospital characteristics. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed between races in total, primary, and revision cohorts.
Results: There were 3464 white, 1428 Hispanic, 413 black, 398 Asian/Pacific-Islander, and 470 patients of other races captured. Black patients experienced more emergent admissions (p = 0.005) and increased length of stay (p = 0.029). Hospital charges were highest for black and Hispanic patients and lowest for white patients (p = 0.019). Black patients had more total complications than non-black patients (p = 0.039), including higher rates of postoperative fistula (p = 0.020) and nonspecific complications among revision repairs (p = 0.003). Asian/Pacific Islander in the primary cohort experienced higher rates of accidental puncture (p = 0.031) and fistula (p < 0.001). Other patients had the highest rates of wound disruption (p = 0.013). After controlling for race, diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, region, elective/nonelective, payer, and income quartile, length of stay (p < 0.001) and age (p < 0.001) were associated with increases in both total complications and costs.
Conclusions: Race may play a significant role in cleft palate repair, as white patients had fewer complications, shorter length of stay, and lower costs following repair. Delayed age at treatment may predispose patients to adverse sequelae in minority populations, in terms of influencing length of stay and costs.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, II.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with hospitalization charges for cleft palate repairs and revisions.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1968-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Oct 19. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22014936
-
A National Assessment of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cleft Lip Repair.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Nov 1;154(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011203. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 37983871
-
Disparities in outcomes for Hispanic patients undergoing endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;27(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23084731
-
Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Feb;14(2):157-165.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.034. Epub 2016 Dec 16. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27993485
-
Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 2. Surgical results.J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017 Feb;51(1):14-20. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1254646. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017. PMID: 28218552 Review.
Cited by
-
Persistent Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction and Strategies for Mitigation.Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6099-6108. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10487-z. Epub 2021 Jul 21. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34287788 Review.
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Repair.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Apr;60(4):482-488. doi: 10.1177/10556656211069828. Epub 2021 Dec 30. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023. PMID: 34967229 Free PMC article.
-
Early Outcomes and Risk Factors in Orthognathic Surgery for Mandibular and Maxillary Hypo- and Hyperplasia: A 13-Year Analysis of a Multi-Institutional Database.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 11;12(4):1444. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041444. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36835979 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of maxillofacial growth in Chinese children with isolated cleft palate treated with two different palatoplasty techniques without relaxing incisions: a preliminary study.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03588-6. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37996823 Free PMC article.
-
Plastic Surgery Diversity through the Decade: Where We Stand and How We Can Improve.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Feb 22;10(2):e4134. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004134. eCollection 2022 Feb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35223343 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al.; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:1008–1016.
-
- Watkins SE, Meyer RE, Strauss RP, Aylsworth AS. Classification, epidemiology, and genetics of orofacial clefts. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41:149–163.
-
- Sabbagh HJ, Hassan MH, Innes NP, Elkodary HM, Little J, Mossey PA. Passive smoking in the etiology of non-syndromic orofacial clefts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116963.
-
- Leslie EJ, Marazita ML. Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163:246–258.
-
- Sasaki Y, Taya Y, Saito K, Fujita K, Aoba T, Fujiwara T. Molecular contribution to cleft palate production in cleft lip mice. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2014;54:94–99.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials