Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.

Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing

Affiliations

Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing

Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiologic form of pacing but associated with higher thresholds and lower success in patients with His-Purkinje conduction disease. Recent reports have described transvenous left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

Objective: We aimed to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and the electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of LBBAP.

Methods: Patients requiring pacing for bradycardia or heart failure indications (failed left ventricular [LV] lead) were prospectively enrolled. LBBAP was performed with a Medtronic 3830 lead. Presence of left bundle branch (LBB) potential, paced QRS morphology/duration, and peak LV activation time (pLVAT) were recorded at implant. Pacing threshold and sensing was assessed at implant and follow-up. Echocardiography was performed to assess the approximate lead location and impact on tricuspid valve function.

Results: LBBAP was successful in 93 of 100 (93%) patients. Mean age was 75 ± 13 years; men 69%, left bundle branch block 24%, right bundle branch block 25%, intraventricular conduction defect 8%. Indications for pacing were atrioventricular (AV) block 54%, sinus node dysfunction 23%, AV node ablation 7%, cardiac resynchronization therapy 11%, HBP lead failure 7%. Baseline QRS duration was 133 ± 35 ms. Paced QRS duration was 136 ± 17 ms. LBB potentials were observed in 63 patients with left bundle branch - ventricle (LBB-V) interval of 27 ± 6 ms. pLVAT was 75 ± 16 ms. Pacing threshold at implant was 0.6 ± 0.4 V @ 0.5 ms and R waves were 10 ± 6 mV and remained stable at median follow-up of 3 months. The lead depth in the septum was approximately 1.4 ± 0.23 cm.

Conclusions: LBBAP was feasible in a high percentage of patients with low thresholds during acute follow-up. HBP and LBBAP may significantly increase the overall success of physiologic pacing.

Keywords: AV block; Conduction system pacing; Echocardiography; His bundle pacing; Left bundle branch area pacing; Physiologic pacing.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources