Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 20;11(5):700.
doi: 10.3390/cancers11050700.

18F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis-A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Affiliations

18F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis-A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Fabio Zattoni et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to predict survivorship of patients with bladder cancer (BC) and/or upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Materials: Data from patients who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspicion of recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively collected in a multicenter study. Disease management after the introduction of FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm was assessed in all patients. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were computed for survival assessment. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of recurrence and death, for BC, UUTC, and concomitant BC and UUTC. Results: Data from 286 patients were collected. Of these, 212 had a history of BC, 38 of UUTC and 36 of concomitant BC and UUTC. Patient management was changed in 114/286 (40%) UC patients with the inclusion of FDG PET/CT, particularly in those with BC, reaching 74% (n = 90/122). After a mean follow-up period of 21 months (Interquartile range: 4-28 mo.), 136 patients (47.4%) had recurrence/progression of disease. Moreover, 131 subjects (45.6%) died. At Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with BC and positive PET/CT had a worse overall survival than those with a negative scan (log-rank < 0.001). Furthermore, a negative PET/CT scan was associated with a lower recurrence rate than a positive examination, independently from the primary tumor site. At multivariate analysis, in patients with BC and UUTC, a positive FDG PET/CT resulted an independent predictor of disease-free and overall survival (p < 0,01). Conclusions: FDG PET/CT has the potential to change patient management, particularly for patients with BC. Furthermore, it can be considered a valid survival prediction tool after primary treatment in patients with recurrent UC. However, a firm recommendation cannot be made yet. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

Keywords: PET/CT; bladder cancer; survival; upper tract urothelial carcinoma; urothelial carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 74 year-old man with a history of bladder cancer underwent thorax and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) scan, which showed suspected lung recurrence. Later, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was negative for any recurrence, particularly in the lung. A further thorax-abdominal ceCT scan, performed after 1 year later, revealed the disappearance of the lung nodule. Therefore, PET/CT was able to change therapeutic management, from a potential curative intent to an observational strategy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 59 year-old woman with bladder cancer underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) for restaging of disease. CT images were considered completely negative. A positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) performed after 3 months, for the persistence of suspicious symptomatology, showed a significant fluoro deoxyglucose uptake in the abdominal lymph nodes and in the liver, compatible with the presence of disease recurrence. The patient was later treated with systemic chemotherapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients (n = 286).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for bladder cancer only (n = 212) (a) and for all patients with UTUC/UTUC and BC (n = 74) (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for bladder cancer only (n = 212) (a) and for all patients with UTUC/UTUC and BC (n = 74) (b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller K.D., Siegel R.L., Lin C.C., Mariotto A.B., Kramer J.L., Rowland J.H., Stein K.D., Alteri R., Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:271–289. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Munoz J.J., Ellison L.M. Upper tract urothelial neoplasms: Incidence and survival during the last 2 decades. J. Urol. 2000;164:1523–1525. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67019-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeldres C., Sun M., Isbarn H., Lughezzani G., Budaus L., Alasker A., Shariat S.F., Lattouf J.B., Widmer H., Pharand D., et al. A population-based assessment of perioperative mortality after nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2010;75:315–320. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abouassaly R., Alibhai S.M., Shah N., Timilshina N., Fleshner N., Finelli A. Troubling outcomes from population-level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2010;76:895–901. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources