Microscopic positive tumor margin does not increase the rate of recurrence in endoscopic resected gastric mesenchymal tumors compared to negative tumor margin
- PMID: 31139992
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06744-8
Microscopic positive tumor margin does not increase the rate of recurrence in endoscopic resected gastric mesenchymal tumors compared to negative tumor margin
Abstract
Background: The endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs) is widely accepted because of its minimal invasiveness. However, one major concern is the high rate of positive microscopic margins remaining following endoscopic resection, which was thought to be related to a higher risk of recurrence. This study aimed to determine whether positive margins affect the recurrence rate of gastric GIMTs and the factors associated with positive margins.
Methods: Patients with gastric GIMTs were recruited retrospectively from January 2008 to December 2013. Clinical and pathological features, endoscopic procedure information, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.
Results: The study included 777 patients. All tumors were removed along with the pseudocapsule without macroscopic residual (ER0), and the median tumor size was 15.2 mm (range 3-100 mm). Pathological evaluation revealed 371(47.7%) GISTs. The rate of microscopic R1 resection rate was 47.0% (443/777). In a stepwise multivariate analysis, a significantly increased incidence of R1 resection was recorded for the GISTs (OR 11.13, 95% CI 3.00-41.37). In a subgroup analysis of GISTs, a univariate analysis revealed that EFTR achieved a higher rate of R0 resection (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.00), but it was proven insignificant in a stepwise multivariate analysis. Local recurrence occurred in two patients (0.3%) during a mean follow-up time of 34.2 months. Differences in the recurrence rates between the R0 and R1 groups were statistically insignificant (P = 0.841).
Conclusions: R1 resection for gastric GIMTs is not related to a higher recurrence rate than R0 resection, and ER0 resection is sufficient for gastric GIMTs.
Keywords: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Endoscopic submucosal excavation; Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; R0 resection; Submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection.
Similar articles
-
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for small (≤ 4.0 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 21;24(27):3030-3037. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i27.3030. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30038470 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in North America: methods and feasibility data.Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1787-1792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5862-9. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28916847
-
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus.Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2553-2561. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6549-6. Epub 2018 Nov 26. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30478693
-
Association between R1 resection and oncological outcome in resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors without tumor rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1526-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Feb 4. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33573855
-
Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.Dig Endosc. 2018 Apr;30 Suppl 1:17-24. doi: 10.1111/den.13003. Dig Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29658639 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Prognosis Between Microscopically Positive and Negative Surgical Margins for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 19;12:679115. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.679115. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35515109 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic resection is not superior to endoscopic resection for relative small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score-matched study.Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;12:1015916. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1015916. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36313715 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor using clip-and-cut endoscopic full-thickness resection: a single-center, retrospective cohort in Korea.Clin Endosc. 2024 May;57(3):350-363. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.144. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Clin Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38356170 Free PMC article.
-
Follow-up analysis and research of very low-risk and low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors after endoscopic resection.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 2;14(1):17872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68460-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39090269 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic treatment outcome of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours.World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 14;31(10):102393. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.102393. World J Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 40093666 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical