Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;34(1):159-169.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06744-8. Epub 2019 May 28.

Microscopic positive tumor margin does not increase the rate of recurrence in endoscopic resected gastric mesenchymal tumors compared to negative tumor margin

Affiliations

Microscopic positive tumor margin does not increase the rate of recurrence in endoscopic resected gastric mesenchymal tumors compared to negative tumor margin

Yan Zhu et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs) is widely accepted because of its minimal invasiveness. However, one major concern is the high rate of positive microscopic margins remaining following endoscopic resection, which was thought to be related to a higher risk of recurrence. This study aimed to determine whether positive margins affect the recurrence rate of gastric GIMTs and the factors associated with positive margins.

Methods: Patients with gastric GIMTs were recruited retrospectively from January 2008 to December 2013. Clinical and pathological features, endoscopic procedure information, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

Results: The study included 777 patients. All tumors were removed along with the pseudocapsule without macroscopic residual (ER0), and the median tumor size was 15.2 mm (range 3-100 mm). Pathological evaluation revealed 371(47.7%) GISTs. The rate of microscopic R1 resection rate was 47.0% (443/777). In a stepwise multivariate analysis, a significantly increased incidence of R1 resection was recorded for the GISTs (OR 11.13, 95% CI 3.00-41.37). In a subgroup analysis of GISTs, a univariate analysis revealed that EFTR achieved a higher rate of R0 resection (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.00), but it was proven insignificant in a stepwise multivariate analysis. Local recurrence occurred in two patients (0.3%) during a mean follow-up time of 34.2 months. Differences in the recurrence rates between the R0 and R1 groups were statistically insignificant (P = 0.841).

Conclusions: R1 resection for gastric GIMTs is not related to a higher recurrence rate than R0 resection, and ER0 resection is sufficient for gastric GIMTs.

Keywords: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Endoscopic submucosal excavation; Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; R0 resection; Submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surg Today. 2012 Jul;42(7):708-11 - PubMed
    1. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 Mar 20;134(11-12):145-53 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;40(4):412-9 - PubMed
    1. Onkologie. 2012;35(11):645-8 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2014 Sep;46(9):758-61 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources