Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar-Apr;22(2):185-190.
doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_389_18.

CRA Grid - A preliminary development and calibration of a paper-based objectivization of caries risk assessment in undergraduate dental education

Sathyanarayanan Ramarao  1 , Usha Sathyanarayanan  2
Affiliations

CRA Grid - A preliminary development and calibration of a paper-based objectivization of caries risk assessment in undergraduate dental education

Sathyanarayanan Ramarao et al. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Context: Caries risk assessment (CRA) varies between students and faculty due to the subjectivity inherent in the process as well as in the critical thinking skills required for the processing of information.

Aims: The aim was to develop a paper-based, grid system, CRA-Grid, to objectivize and standardize risk assessment and to assess its rating agreement with the critical thinking process of the teachers.

Settings and design: The CRA-Grid was developed and tested in a clinical study, in Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry.

Materials and methods: Based on the currently available evidence, specific weightages were assigned to the risk factors in an existing CRA form. A 10 × 10 paper grid was created incorporating these weightages. Shading and summing up the respective squares in the grid provided a percentage score. The class interval of percentage indicating the risk status was determined using historical clinical data. After training, the students performed CRA of 57 patients by using the CRA-Grid. Six faculties were blinded to these scores and assessed the risk by critical thinking process.

Statistical analysis used: Cohen's weighted kappa (k) for inter-rater agreement was run using Graph Pad QuickCalcs.

Results: Cohen's weighted kappa for agreement at 95% confidence interval, between the CRA-Grid and critical thinking process, ranged from "good" to "very good." Mean percentage of agreement of the six faculty was 79.6%; and with caries grid, was 80.5%.

Conclusions: Risk assessment with the paper-based, objectivized, CRA-Grid matched that done by critical thinking process.

Keywords: Critical thinking; dental caries; dental education; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample caries risk assessment form incorporating the caries grid and the guidelines
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage distribution of high/moderate and low-risk status assigned with caries risk assessment-grid and teachers’ critical thinking process (L: Low/M: Moderate/H: High)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Twetman S, Fontana M, Featherstone JD. Risk assessment – Can we achieve consensus? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:e64–70. - PubMed
    1. Fontana M, Zero DT. Assessing patients’ caries risk. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1231–9. - PubMed
    1. Twetman S, Fontana M. Patient caries risk assessment. Monogr Oral Sci. 2009;21:91–101. - PubMed
    1. Zero D, Fontana M, Lennon AM. Clinical applications and outcomes of using indicators of risk in caries management. J Dent Educ. 2001;65:1126–32. - PubMed
    1. Young DA, Featherstone JD. Implementing caries risk assessment and clinical interventions. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:495–505. - PubMed