Comparative screening of endosymbiotic bacteria associated with the asexual and sexual lineages of the termite Glyptotermes nakajimai
- PMID: 31143363
- PMCID: PMC6527188
- DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2019.1592418
Comparative screening of endosymbiotic bacteria associated with the asexual and sexual lineages of the termite Glyptotermes nakajimai
Abstract
Males provide opportunities both for sexual reproduction and for sex-based phenotypic differences within animal societies. In termites, the ubiquitous presence of both male and female workers and soldiers indicate that males play a critical role in colonies of these insects. However, we have recently reported all-female asexual societies in a lineage of the termite Glyptotermes nakajimai - a dramatic transition from mixed-sex to all-female asexual societies. It is known that female-producing parthenogenesis in insects can be induced by maternally inherited endosymbiotic bacteria, such as Wolbachia, Cardinium, and Rickettsia. Here, we screen for the presence of endosymbiotic bacteria in the asexual and sexual lineages of G. nakajimai. Our bacterial screening of the asexual lineage did not reveal any likely causal agents for parthenogenetic reproduction, whereas screening of the sexual lineage resulted in Wolbachia being detected. Our findings suggest that the asexuality in G. nakajimai is likely to be maintained without manipulation by endosymbiotic bacteria.
Keywords: All-female asexual societies; reproductive parasites; social insects; thelytokous parthenogenesis.
Figures
References
-
- Bird R. Cooperation and conflict: the behavioral ecology of the sexual division of labor. Evol Anthropol. 1999;8:65–75.
-
- Wilson EO. Sociobiology: the new synthesis, 25th anniversary edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2000.
-
- Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH. Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:408–413. - PubMed
-
- Matsuura K. A novel hypothesis for the origin of the sexual division of labor in termites: which sex should be soldiers? Evol Ecol. 2006;20:565–574.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources