Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Oct;24(10):1223-1230.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01473-3. Epub 2019 May 29.

Multicenter phase II study of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (JSWOG-C3 study)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multicenter phase II study of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (JSWOG-C3 study)

Nobuaki Suzuki et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Triweekly capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) was not a replacement for fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) because of the potential for greater toxicity. Recently, it has reported that mCAPIRI is well tolerated and non-inferior to FOLFIRI. In this study, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC with reduced toxicity and preserved efficacy.

Methods: Patients with mCRC who had received prior chemotherapy, including oxaliplatin-based regimens, were eligible for this study. The treatment protocol administered capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from the evening of day 1 to the morning of day 8, intravenous irinotecan at 150 mg/m2 on day 1, and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg on day 1 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints for this study were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, response rate (RR), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.23-7.40 months], and median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.57-20.23 months). The RR was 14.6% (95% CI 6.5-28.4%), and the DCR was 66.7% (95% CI 51.5-79.2%). Hypertension was the most common Grade 3 adverse event (27.5%), followed by neutropenia (17.6%). Only two patients suffered from grade 3 hand-foot syndrome.

Conclusions: In mCRC patients, biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab appears effective and feasible as a second-line chemotherapy with relatively low toxicities, and has potential as a useful substitute for FOLFIRI + bevacizumab.

Keywords: Bevacizumab; Biweekly; CAPIRI; Second line; mCRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflict of interest to disclose with any companies.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) in the full analysis set of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab as second-line treatment. Median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.23–7.40 months)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set of mCRC patients treated with biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab as second-line treatment. Median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.57–20.23 months)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates of time to treatment failure (TTF) in the full analysis set of mCRC patients treated with biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab as second-line treatment. Median TTF was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.97–6.93 months)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Waterfall-plot analysis of maximum target lesion response compared to the baseline in patients with mCRC treated with second-line biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab (N = 49). Apart from one patient administered anti-EGFR antibody, the other six patients who had target lesions increased over 20% used bevacizumab as first-line therapy. CAPIRI capecitabine plus irinotecan regimen
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) in the full analysis set of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab versus anti-EGFR (cetuximab or panitumumab) as first-line treatment. Median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.43–10.33) and 6.8 months (95% CI 3.97–37.33) for the bevacizumab group and anti-EGFR group, respectively. Bev bevacizumab. p = 0.4, log-rank test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Parkin DM, et al. Global burden of cancer in 2008: a systematic analysis of disability-adjusted life-years in 12 world regions. Lancet. 2012;380(9856):1840–1850. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60919-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–2019. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9930. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1306–1315. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00122-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types