Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;7(7):e00727.
doi: 10.1002/mgg3.727. Epub 2019 May 29.

Influence of common SCN1A promoter variants on the severity of SCN1A-related phenotypes

Affiliations

Influence of common SCN1A promoter variants on the severity of SCN1A-related phenotypes

Iris M de Lange et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Pathogenic variants in SCN1A cause variable epilepsy disorders with different disease severities. We here investigate whether common variation in the promoter region of the unaffected SCN1A allele could reduce normal expression, leading to a decreased residual function of Nav1.1, and therefore to more severe clinical outcomes in patients affected by pathogenic SCN1A variants.

Methods: Five different SCN1A promoter-haplotypes were functionally assessed in SH-SY5Y cells using Firefly and Renilla luciferase assays. The SCN1A promoter region was analyzed in a cohort of 143 participants with SCN1A pathogenic variants. Differences in clinical features and outcomes between participants with and without common variants in the SCN1A promoter-region of their unaffected allele were investigated.

Results: All non-wildtype haplotypes showed a significant reduction in luciferase expression, compared to the wildtype promoter-region (65%-80%, p = 0.039-0.0023). No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between patients with and without common promoter variants. However, patients with a wildtype promoter-haplotype on their unaffected SCN1A allele showed a nonsignificant trend for milder phenotypes.

Conclusion: The nonsignificant observed trends in our study warrant replication studies in larger cohorts to explore the potential modifying role of these common SCN1A promoter-haplotypes.

Keywords: SCN1A; Dravet; GEFS+; promoter; variable expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview SCN1A 5' UTR. SCN1A has a complex 5’ UTR. Three major promoter regions (blue) and five 5’ UE (pink) are currently known. The half‐tick up lines indicate a promoter region with a subsequent 5’ UE which together carry consensus regions for multiple transcription factor binding sites and initiator elements. Transcription start sites are indicated with an arrow. Dashed lines indicate the distance to next element. Underlined elements indicate the remaining two 5’ UEs and the first coding exon of SCN1A (green). Figure established based on previous work (Dong et al., 2014; Long et al., 2008; Nakayama et al., 2010)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Functional effect of common promoter variants in SCN1A. Top: Simplified SCN1A 5’ UTR, adapted from Figure 1. Middle: Promoter haplotypes tested in this study. Haplotype 1 depicts a promoter + h1u region without common variants. Haplotype 2, 3, 4 and 5 carry multiple common variants spread over the promoter region: −1964 (rs2212657, MAF 0.43), −1663 (rs151217464, MAF 0.01), −1449 (rs7606233, MAF 0.50), −1036 (rs4319946, MAF 0.49), −688 (rs16851669, MAF 0.50), −244 (rs80169419, MAF 0.07), −52 (rs16851666, MAF 0.50) and 34 (rs757291646, MAF < 0.01). Bottom: Luciferase expression analysis of SCN1A promoter haplotypes as depicted above. Empty vector (SV40) expression was set to 100%. Haplotype 1, without common variants was used as control haplotype of which the expression reduction of Haplotype 2, 3, 4 and 5 was measured
Figure 3
Figure 3
distribution of different cognitive outcome scores between patients with and without variants in the promoter‐region of their unaffected SCN1A allele
Figure 4
Figure 4
distribution of age at seizure onset between patients with and without variants in the promoter‐region of their unaffected SCN1A allele
Figure 5
Figure 5
distribution of onset of developmental delay between patients with and without variants in the promoter‐region of their unaffected SCN1A allele
Figure 6
Figure 6
distribution of age at first afebrile seizure between patients with and without variants in the promoter‐region of their unaffected SCN1A allele
Figure 7
Figure 7
distribution of IQ/DQ scores after five years of disease between patients with and without variants in the promoter‐region of their unaffected SCN1A allele
Figure 8
Figure 8
Family tree I‐IV. Orange box indicates mild epilepsy phenotype with normal cognitive functioning. Light red box indicates a mild DS, or borderline DS/GEFS+ phenotype. Dark red boxes indicate severe DS. Numbers in the boxes correspond to promoter haplotype number or wildtype haplotype from Figure 2

References

    1. Akiyama, M. , Kobayashi, K. , Yoshinaga, H. , & Ohtsuka, Y. (2010). A long‐term follow‐up study of Dravet syndrome up to adulthood. Epilepsia, 51(6), 1043–1052. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02466.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anney, R. J. L. , Avbersek, A. , Balding, D. , Baum, L. , Becker, F. , Berkovic, S. F. , … Zimprich, F. (2014). Genetic determinants of common epilepsies: A meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association studies. The Lancet Neurology, 13(9), 893–903. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70171-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunklaus, A. , Ellis, R. , Reavey, E. , Forbes, G. , & Zuberi, S. (2012). Prognostic, clinical and demographic features in SCN1A mutation‐positive Dravet syndrome. Brain, 135(8), 2329–2336. 10.1093/brain/aws151 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Catterall, W. A. , Kalume, F. , & Oakley, J. C. (2010). NaV1.1 channels and epilepsy. The Journal of Physiology, 588(11), 1849–1859. 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.187484 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceulemans, B. (2011). Overall management of patients with Dravet syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(Suppl. 2), 19–23. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03968.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances