Quantitative assessment of the activity of antituberculosis drugs and regimens
- PMID: 31144539
- PMCID: PMC6581212
- DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1621747
Quantitative assessment of the activity of antituberculosis drugs and regimens
Abstract
Introduction: Identification of optimal drug doses and drug combinations is crucial for optimized treatment of tuberculosis. Areas covered: An unprecedented level of research activity involving multiple approaches is seeking to improve tuberculosis treatment. This report is a review of the quantitative methods currently used on clinical data sets to identify drug exposure targets and optimal drug combinations for tuberculosis treatment. A high-level summary of the methods, including the strengths and weaknesses of each method and potential methodological improvements is presented. Methods incorporating data generated from multiple sources such as in vitro and clinical studies, and their potential to provide better estimates of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets, are discussed. PK/PD relationships identified are compared between different studies and data analysis methods. Expert opinion: The relationships between drug exposures and tuberculosis treatment outcomes are complex and require analytical methods capable of handling the multidimensional nature of the relationships. The choice of a method is guided by its complexity, interpretability of results, and type of data available.
Keywords: Tuberculosis; classification and regression trees; machine learning; multivariate adaptive regression splines; pharmacodynamic; pharmacokinetic; random forests.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interest
T Gumbo founded Praedicare LLC. The other authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
References
-
- Chen C, Wicha SG, Nordgren R, Simonsson USH. Comparisons of analysis methods for assessment of pharmacodynamic interactions including design recommendations. AAPS J 2018;20:77. - PubMed
-
- Pasipanodya JG, Nuermberger E, Romero K, Hanna D, Gumbo T. Systematic analysis of hollow fiber model of tuberculosis experiments. Clin. Infect. Dis 2015;61(suppl 1):S10–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical