Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;7(6):505-515.
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.03.011.

Sex-Based Differences in Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: Phenotyping, and Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications

Affiliations
Free article

Sex-Based Differences in Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: Phenotyping, and Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications

Davide Stolfo et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;8(4):345-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.02.002. JACC Heart Fail. 2020. PMID: 32241544 No abstract available.

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed sex-related differences in a large cohort of unselected patients with heart failure (HF) across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum.

Background: Females are under-represented in randomized clinical trials. Potential sex-related differences in HF may question the generalizability of trials.

Methods: In the Swedish Heart Failure Registry population multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to investigate differences in prognosis, prognostic predictors, and treatments across males and females.

Results: Of 42,987 patients, 37% were females (55% with HF with preserved EF [HFpEF], 39% with HF with mid-range EF [HFmrEF], and 29% with HF with reduced EF [HFrEF]). Females were older and more symptomatic and more likely to have hypertension and kidney disease but less likely to have diabetes and ischemic heart disease. After adjustments, females were more likely to use beta-blockers and digoxin but less likely to receive HF device therapy. Crude mortality/HF hospitalization rates for HFpEF (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16) and HFmrEF (HR: 1.14) were significantly higher in females but lower in females with HFrEF (HR: 0.95). After adjustments, the risk was significantly lower in females regardless of EF (HR: 0.80 in HFrEF, HR: 0.91 in HFmrEF, and HR: 0.93 in HFpEF). The main sex-related differences in prognostic predictors concerned diabetes in HFrEF and anemia in HFmrEF.

Conclusions: Males and females with HF showed different characteristics across the EF spectrum. Males reported a lower crude risk of mortality/morbidity in HFpEF and HFmrEF but higher risk of HFrEF, although after adjustments, prognosis was better in females regardless of EF. The observed sex-related differences highlight the need for an adequate representation of females in HF randomized controlled trials to improve generalizability.

Keywords: gender; heart failure; heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; outcome; registry; sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Dare to Achieve Health Equity.
    Breathett K. Breathett K. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):516-517. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.015. JACC Heart Fail. 2019. PMID: 31146875 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms