Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Required for a Core Biopsy Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion?
- PMID: 31147995
- PMCID: PMC6684408
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07475-9
Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Required for a Core Biopsy Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion?
Abstract
Background: Among patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), approximately 10% have microinvasion (DCISM), which, like DCIS, is subject to upstaging by surgical excision, but for which the rates of T and N upstaging are unknown, as is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), since current studies of SLNB for DCISM are based on the final pathologic report, not the core needle biopsy. In this study, we identified the rates of T and N upstaging following surgical excision in patients with a suspected versus definite core needle biopsy diagnosis of DCISM.
Methods: Overall, 369 consecutive patients (2007-2017) with a core biopsy diagnosis of suspected versus definite DCISM and surgical excision were stratified by extent of DCISM on core biopsy: suspicious focus, single focus, multiple foci/single biopsy, and multiple foci/multiple biopsies. Within strata, we identified clinicopathologic features associated with T and N upstaging.
Results: Across core biopsy strata, there were no clear differences in imaging characteristics or median invasive tumor size (0.2 cm). Among 105 patients with a core biopsy suspicious for DCISM versus 264 with definite DCISM, 28% and 37%, respectively, were upstaged to at least pT1a, but only 1% and 6%, respectively, to pN1.
Conclusions: Although 28% of patients with suspected DCISM on core biopsy were surgically upstaged to invasive cancer, the frequency of pN1 SLN metastasis (1%) was comparable with that of DCIS, and was insufficient to recommend SLNB at initial surgery. SLNB remains reasonable for patients with definite DCISM on core biopsy.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Dr. Monica Morrow has received speaking honoraria from Roche and Genomic Health. Meghan R. Flanagan, Michelle Stempel, Edi Brogi, and Hiram S. Cody III have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures

Comment in
-
ASO Author Reflections: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Suspicion for Microinvasion on Core Needle Biopsy.Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(Suppl 3):704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07747-4. Epub 2019 Aug 23. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31444603 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Gojon H, Fawunmi D, Valachis A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with microinvasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(1):5–11. - PubMed
-
- Ko BS, Lim WS, Kim HJ, Yu JH, Lee JW, Kwan SB, et al. Risk factor for axillary lymph node metastases in microinvasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):212–6. - PubMed
-
- Kapoor NS, Shamonki J, Sim MS, Chung CT, Giuliano AE. Impact of multifocality and lymph node metastasis on the prognosis and management of microinvasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2576–81. - PubMed
-
- Margalit DN, Sreedhara M, Chen YH, Catalano PJ, Nguyen PL, Golshan M, et al. Microinvasive breast cancer: ER, PR, and HER-2/neu status and clinical outcomes after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):811–8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous