Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;49(3):140-149.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.3.140. Epub 2019 May 21.

A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign®

Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign®

Lidia Galan-Lopez et al. Korean J Orthod. 2019 May.

Abstract

We are currently living in an era where the use of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing has allowed individualized orthodontic treatments, but has also incorporated enhanced digitalized technology that does not permit improvisation. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze publications that assessed the accuracy and efficiency of the Invisalign® system. A systematic review was performed using a search strategy to identify articles that referenced Invisalign®, which were published between August 2007 and August 2017, and listed in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, and LILACS. Additionally, a manual search of clinical trials was performed in scientific journals and other databases. To rate the methodological quality of the articles, a grading system described by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care was used, in combination with the Cochrane tool for risk of bias assessment. We selected 20 articles that met the inclusion criteria and excluded 5 due to excess biases. The level of evidence was high. Although it is possible to treat malocclusions with plastic systems, the results are not as accurate as those achieved by treatment with fixed appliances.

Keywords: Clear aligners; Invisalign®; Invisible orthodontics; Treatment outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram.

References

    1. Fujiyama K, Honjo T, Suzuki M, Matsuoka S, Deguchi T. Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJ, et al. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patient's satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: a randomized, prospective trial. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:801–808. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Ortodontia contemporánea. 5th ed. Barcelona: Elsevier Mosby; 2013.
    1. Kesling HD. The philosophy of tooth positioning appliance. Am J Orthod. 1945;31:297–304.

LinkOut - more resources