Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 31;5(5):CD009903.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009903.pub3.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in people with multiple sclerosis

Affiliations

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in people with multiple sclerosis

Vanitha A Jagannath et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of neurological disability in young adults. The most widely accepted hypothesis regarding its pathogenesis is that it is an immune-mediated disease. It has been hypothesised that intraluminal defects, compression, or hypoplasia in the internal jugular or azygos veins may be important factors in the pathogenesis of MS. This condition has been named 'chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency' (CCSVI). It has been suggested that these intraluminal defects restrict the normal blood flow from the brain and spinal cord, causing the deposition of iron in the brain and the eventual triggering of an auto-immune response. The proposed treatment for CCSVI is venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), which is claimed to improve the blood flow in the brain thereby alleviating some of the symptoms of MS. This is an update of a review first published in 2012.

Objectives: To assess the benefit and safety of venous PTA in people with MS and CCSVI.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group's Specialised Register up to 30 August 2018, CENTRAL (in the Cochrane Library 2018, issue 8), MEDLINE up to 30 August 2018, Embase up to 30 August 2018, metaRegister of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov., the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry platform. We examined the bibliographies of the included and excluded studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which PTA and sham interventions were compared in adults with MS and CCSVI.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We reported results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed statistical analyses using the random-effects model; and we assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

Main results: We included three RCTs (238 participants) in this update. One hundred and thirty-four participants were randomised to PTA and 104 to sham treatment. We attributed low risk of bias to two (67%) studies for sequence generation and two (67%) studies for performance bias. All studies were at a low risk of detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and other potential sources of bias.There was moderate-quality evidence to suggest that venous PTA did not increase the proportion of patients who had operative or post-operative serious adverse events compared with the sham procedure (RR 3.33, 95% CI 0.36 to 30.44; 3 studies, 238 participants); nor did it increase the proportion of patients who improved on a functional composite measure including walking control, balance, manual dexterity, postvoid residual urine volume, and visual acuity over 12-month follow-up (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.30; 1 study, 110 participants); nor did it reduce the proportion of patients who experienced new relapses at six- or 12-month follow-up (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.49; 3 studies, 235 participants). There was no effect of venous PTA on disability worsening measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, which was reported at follow-up intervals of six months (one study), 11 months (one study) and 12 months (one study). Quality of life was reported in two studies with no difference between treatment groups. Moderate or severe pain during or post venography was reported in both PTA and sham-procedure participants in all included studies. Venous PTA was not effective in restoring blood flow assessed at one-month (one study) or 12-month follow-up (one study).

Authors' conclusions: This systematic review identified moderate-quality evidence that, compared with sham procedure, venous PTA intervention did not provide benefit on patient-centred outcomes (disability, physical or cognitive functions, relapses, quality of life) in people with MS. Venous PTA has proven to be a safe technique but in view of the available evidence of its ineffectiveness, this intervention cannot be recommended in people with MS. All ongoing trials were withdrawn or terminated and hence this updated review is conclusive. No further randomised clinical studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EP has received funds from a non‐profit association, the "Associazione Marchigiana sclerosi multipla e altre malattie neurologiche"; this association has received donations from Biogen Dompé, Merck‐Serono and Bayer‐Schering. In the period 2007 to 2012, EP also received honoraria, reimbursement for attending congresses, and grant support for organising scientific activities from the above‐mentioned drug industries and from Aventis, UCB, Lundbeck and Novartis. The other review authors have no financial conflicts of interest and they do not have any associations with any parties who may have vested interests in the results of this review. One of the authors (ER) has undergone the procedure under consideration in this review.

Figures

1
1
Flow diagram of studies included in the systematic review
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 PTA vs SHAM, Outcome 1 Proportion of participants who experienced operative or postoperative serious adverse events.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 PTA vs SHAM, Outcome 2 Proportion of participants who experienced improvement of composite functional endpoint over 12 months.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 PTA vs SHAM, Outcome 3 Proportion of participants who experienced new relapses over 12 months.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Siddiqui 2014 {published data only}
    1. Siddiqui AH, Zivadinov R, Benedict RH, Karmon Y, Yu J, Hartney ML, et al. Prospective randomized trial of venous angioplasty in MS (PREMiSe). Neurology 2014;83(5):441‐9. [PUBMED: 24975855] - PMC - PubMed
Traboulsee 2018 {published data only}
    1. Traboulsee AL, Machan L, Girard JM, Raymond J, Vosoughi R, Hardy BW, et al. Safety and efficacy of venoplasty in MS: A randomized, double‐blind, sham‐controlled phase II trial. Neurology 2018;91(18):e1660‐8. [PUBMED: 30266886] - PMC - PubMed
Zamboni 2018 {published data only}
    1. Zamboni P, Tesio L, Galimberti S, Massacesi L, Salvi F, D'Alessandro R, et al. Efficacy and safety of extracranial vein angioplasty in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology 2018;75(1):35‐43. [PUBMED: 29150995] - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

ACTRN12612000302853 {published and unpublished data}
    1. ACTRN12612000302853. A randomised, blinded, controlled study of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for extracranial vein stenoses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). www.anzctr.org.au.
Alroughani 2013 {published data only}
    1. Alroughani R, Lamdhade S, Thussu A. Endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. International Journal of Neuroscience 2013;123(5):324‐8. [PUBMED: 23301864] - PubMed
De Pasquale 2014 {published data only}
    1. Pasquale C, Pistorio ML, Veroux M, Giaquinta A, Veroux P, Fornaro M. Cognitive functioning and subjective quality of life in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: a preliminary report. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014;10:1039‐44. [PUBMED: 24959079] - PMC - PubMed
Ghezzi 2013 {published data only}
    1. Ghezzi A, Annovazzi P, Cocco E, Coarelli G, Lugaresi A, Rovaris M, et al. Endovascular treatment of CCSVI in patients with multiple sclerosis: clinical outcome of 462 cases. Neurological Sciences 2013;34(9):1633‐7. - PubMed
Hubbard 2012 {published data only}
    1. Hubbard D, Ponec D, Gooding J, Saxon R, Sauder H, Haacke M. Clinical improvement after extracranial venoplasty in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR 2012;23(10):1302‐8. [PUBMED: 22951366] - PubMed
NCT01089686 {unpublished data only}
    1. NCT01089686. Study to evaluate treating chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in multiple sclerosis patients. www.clinicaltrials.gov.
NCT01201707 {unpublished data only}
    1. NCT01201707. Evaluation of angioplasty in the treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in multiple sclerosis. www.clinicaltrials.gov.
NCT01555684 {unpublished data only}
    1. NCT01555684. Functional changes following percutaneous venoplasty in multiple sclerosis patients. www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Radak 2014 {published data only}
    1. Radak D, Kolar J, Sagic D, Ilijevski N, Tanaskovic S, Aleksic N, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty of internal jugular and azygous veins in patients with chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: early and mid‐term results. Phlebology 2014;29(6):367‐75. [PUBMED: 23563645] - PubMed
Zagaglia 2013 {published data only}
    1. Zagaglia S, Balestrini S, Perticaroli E, Danni MC, Luzzi S, Silvestrini M, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: dichotomy between subjective and objective outcome scores. Neurological Sciences 2013;34(12):2205‐10. [PUBMED: 23660636] - PubMed
Zivadinov 2013 {published data only}
    1. Zivadinov R, Magnano C, Galeotti R, Schirda C, Menegatti E, Weinstock‐Guttman B, et al. Changes of cine cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: a case‐control study. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR 2013;24(6):829‐38. [PUBMED: 23523158] - PubMed

Additional references

Al‐Omari 2010
    1. Al‐Omari MH, Rousan LA. Internal jugular vein morphology and hemodynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis. International Angiology 2010;29(2):115‐20. [PUBMED: PMID: 20351667] - PubMed
Anon 2010
    1. Anon. Experimental multiple sclerosis vascular shunting procedure halted at Stanford. Annals of Neurology 2010;67(1):A13‐5. [PUBMED: PMID: 20186848] - PubMed
Bagert 2011
    1. Bagert BA, Marder E, Stüve O. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 2011;68(11):1379‐84. [PUBMED: PMID: 21747006] - PubMed
Baracchini 2011
    1. Baracchini C, Perini P, Calabrese M, Causin F, Rinaldi F, Gallo P. No evidence of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency at multiple sclerosis onset. Annals of Neurology 2011;69(1):90‐9. [PUBMED: PMID: 21280079] - PubMed
Bavera 2011
    1. Bavera PM, Mendozzi L, Cavarretta R, Agus GB. Venous extracranial Duplex ultrasound and possible correlations between multiple sclerosis and CCSVI: an observational study after 560 exams. Acta Phlebologica 2011;12(2):109‐13.
Benjaminy 2018
    1. Benjaminy S, Schepmyer A, Illes J, Traboulsee A. Resilience, trust, and civic engagement in the post‐CCSVI era. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1):366. [PUBMED: 29769084] - PMC - PubMed
Burton 2011
    1. Burton JM, Alikhani K, Goyal M, Costello F, White C, Patry D, et al. Complications in MS patients after CCSVI procedures abroad (Calgary, AB). Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences [Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques] 2011;38(5):741‐6. [PUBMED: PMID: 21856578] - PubMed
Centonze 2011
    1. Centonze D, Floris R, Stefanini M, Rossi S, Fabiano S, Castelli M, et al. Proposed chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency criteria do not predict multiple sclerosis risk or severity. Annals of Neurology 2011;70(1):51‐8. [PUBMED: PMID: 21786298] - PubMed
Comi 2013
    1. Comi G, Battaglia MA, Bertolotto A, Sette M, Ghezzi A, Malferrari G, et al. Observational case‐control study of the prevalence of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency inmultiple sclerosis: results from the CoSMo study. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2013;19(11):1508‐17. [PUBMED: 24014572] - PubMed
D'haeseleer 2011
    1. D'haeseleer M, Cambron M, Vanopdenbosch L, Keyser J. Vascular aspects of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurology 2011;10(7):657–66. [PUBMED: PMID: 21683931] - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7:177–88. - PubMed
Diehm 2007
    1. Diehm N, Baumgartner I, Jaff M, Do DD, Minar E, Schmidli J, et al. A call for uniform reporting standards in studies assessing endovascular treatment for chronic ischaemia of lower limb arteries. European Heart Journal 2007;28(7):798‐805. [PUBMED: PMID: 17317699] - PubMed
Doepp 2010
    1. Doepp F, Paul F, Valdueza JM, Schmierer K, Schreiber SJ. No cerebrocervical venous congestion in patients with multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 2010;68(2):173‐83. [PUBMED: PMID: 20695010] - PubMed
Dorne 2010
    1. Dorne H, Zaidat OO, Fiorella D, Hirsh J, Prestigiacomo C, Albuquerque F, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and the doubtful promise of an endovascular treatment for multiple sclerosis. AACN Clinical Issues in Critical Care Nursing 2010;2(4):309‐11. - PubMed
Driedger 2017
    1. Driedger SM, Maier R, Marrie RA, Brouwers M. Caught in a no‐win situation: discussions about CCSVI between persons with multiple sclerosis and their neurologists ‐ a qualitative study. BMC Neurology 2017;17(1):176. [PUBMED: 28882115] - PMC - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629‐34. [PUBMED: PMID: 9310563] - PMC - PubMed
Fischer 1999
    1. Fischer JS, LaRocca NG, Miller DM, Ritvo PG, Andrews H, Paty D. Recent developments in the assessment of quality of life in multiple sclerosis (MS). Multiple Sclerosis 1999;5(4):251‐9. [PUBMED: PMID:10467384] - PubMed
Ghezzi 2011
    1. Ghezzi A, Comi G, Federico A. Chronic cerebro‐spinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) and multiple sclerosis. Neurological Sciences 2011;32(1):17‐21. [PUBMED: PMID: 21161309] - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Hojnacki 2010
    1. Hojnacki D, Zamboni P, Lopez‐Soriano A, Galleotti R, Menegatti E, Weinstock‐Guttman B, et al. Use of neck magnetic resonance venography, Doppler sonography and selective venography for diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a pilot study in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. International Angiology 2010;29(2):127‐39. [PUBMED: PMID: 20351669] - PubMed
Khan 2010
    1. Khan O, Filippi M, Freedman MS, Barkhof F, Dore‐Duffy P, Lassmann H, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 2010;67(3):286‐90. [PUBMED: PMID: 20373339] - PubMed
Kos 2005
    1. Kos D, Kerckhofs E, Carrea I, Verza R, Ramos M, Jansa J. Evaluation of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in four different European countries. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2005;11(1):76‐80. - PubMed
Krogias 2010
    1. Krogias C, Schröder A, Wiendl H, Hohlfeld R, Gold R. "Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency" and multiple sclerosis: critical analysis and first observation in an unselected cohort of MS patients [in German]. Der Nervenarzt 2010;81(6):740‐6. [PUBMED: PMID: 20386873] - PubMed
Kuhlmann 2017
    1. Kuhlmann T, Ludwin S, Prat A, Antel J, Bruck W, Lassmann H. An updated histological classification system for multiple sclerosis lesions. Acta Neuropathologica 2017;133(1):13‐24. - PubMed
Kurtzke 1983
    1. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33(11):1444‐52. [PUBMED: PMID: 6685237] - PubMed
Lazzaro 2011
    1. Lazzaro MA, Zaidat OO, Mueller‐Kronast N, Taqi MA, Woo D. Endovascular therapy for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology 2011;2:44. [PUBMED: PMID: 21808631] - PMC - PubMed
Lublin 1996
    1. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46(4):907‐11. [PUBMED: PMID: 8780061] - PubMed
Lucchinetti 2000
    1. Lucchinetti C, Brück W, Parisi J, Scheithauer B, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions:implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Annals of Neurology 2000;47(6):707‐17. - PubMed
Malagoni 2010
    1. Malagoni AM, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, Manfredini F, Basaglia N, Salvi F, et al. Is chronic fatigue the symptom of venous insufficiency associated with multiple sclerosis? A longitudinal pilot study. International Angiology 2010;29(2):176‐82. [PUBMED: PMID: 20351673] - PubMed
Marder 2011
    1. Marder E, Gupta P, Greenberg BM, Frohman EM, Awad AM, Bagert B, et al. No cerebral or cervical venous insufficiency in US veterans with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 2011; Vol. 68, issue 12:1521‐5. [PUBMED: PMID: 21825217] - PubMed
Martino 2002
    1. Martino G, Adorini L, Rieckmann P, Hillert J, Kallmann B, Comi G, et al. Inflammation in multiple sclerosis: the good, the bad, and the complex. Lancet Neurology 2002;1(8):499‐509. [PUBMED: 12849335] - PubMed
McDonald 2001
    1. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 2001;50(1):121‐7. [PUBMED: PMID: 11456302] - PubMed
Paul 2014
    1. Paul F, Wattjes MP. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: the final curtain. Lancet 2014;383(9912):106‐8. [PUBMED: 24119383] - PubMed
Piga 2014
    1. Piga MA. About patients, "inventors", journalists, scientists and IRBS (to say nothing of the institutions): CCSVI and MS. Medicine and Law 2014;33(4):177‐87. [PUBMED: 27351054] - PubMed
Polman 2005
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Annals of Neurology 2005;58(6):840‐6. [PUBMED: PMID: 16283615] - PubMed
Polman 2011
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals of Neurology 2011;69(2):292‐302. [PUBMED: PMID: 21387374] - PMC - PubMed
Rao 1991
    1. Rao SM, Leo GJ, Ellington L, Nauertz T, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology 1991;41(5):692‐6. [PUBMED: PMID: 1823781] - PubMed
Reekers 2011
    1. Reekers JA, Lee MJ, Belli AM, Barkhof F. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe commentary on the treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2011;34(1):1‐2. [PUBMED: PMID: 21136256] - PMC - PubMed
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rudick 2007
    1. Rudick RA, Miller D, Hass S, Hutchinson M, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, et al. Health‐related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: effects of natalizumab. Annals of Neurology 2007;62(4):335‐46. [PUBMED: PMID: 17696126] - PubMed
Schünemann 2011
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and ‘Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Sellner 2011
    1. Sellner J, Kraus J, Awad A, Milo R, Hemmer B, Stüve O. The increasing incidence and prevalence of female multiple sclerosis ‐ a critical analysis of potential environmental factors. Autoimmunity Reviews 2011;10(8):495‐502. [PUBMED: PMID: 21354338] - PubMed
Simeoni 2008
    1. Simeoni M, Auquier P, Fernandez O, Flachenecker P, Stecchi S, Constantinescu C. Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2008;14(2):219‐30. [PUBMED: PMID:17942521] - PubMed
Simka 2010
    1. Simka M, Kostecki J, Zaniewski M, Majewski E, Hartel M. Extracranial Doppler sonographic criteria of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in the patients with multiple sclerosis. International Angiology 2010;29(2):109‐14. [PUBMED: PMID: 20351666] - PubMed
Simpson 2011
    1. Simpson S Jr, Blizzard L, Otahal P, Mei I, Taylor B. Latitude is significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2011;82(10):1132‐41. [PUBMED: PMID: 21478203] - PubMed
Singh 2009
    1. Singh AV, Zamboni P. Anomalous venous blood flow and iron deposition in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 2009;29(12):1867‐78. [PUBMED: PMID: 19724286] - PubMed
Sundström 2010
    1. Sundström P, Wåhlin A, Ambarki K, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J. Venous and cerebrospinal fluid flow in multiple sclerosis: a case‐control study. Annals of Neurology 2010;68(2):255‐9. [PUBMED: PMID: 20695018] - PubMed
Thompson 2018
    1. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, at al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurology 2018;17(2):162‐73. - PubMed
Traboulsee 2014
    1. Traboulsee AL, Knox KB, Machan L, Zhao Y, Yee I, Rauscher A, et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case‐control study. Lancet (London, England) 2014;383(9912):138‐45. [PUBMED: 24119384] - PubMed
Tsivgoulis 2011
    1. Tsivgoulis G, Mantatzis M, Bogiatzi C, Vadikolias K, Voumvourakis K, Prassopoulos P, et al. Extracranial venous hemodynamics in multiple sclerosis: a case‐control study. Neurology 2011;77(13):1241‐5. [PUBMED: PMID: 21849653] - PubMed
van Rensburg 2010
    1. Rensburg SJ, Toorn R. The controversy of CCSVI and iron in multiple sclerosis: is ferritin the key?. Neurology 2010;75(18):1581‐2. [PUBMED: PMID: 20881276] - PubMed
Vickrey 1995
    1. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Harooni R, Myers LW, Ellison GW. A health‐related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research 1995;4(3):187‐206. [PUBMED: PMID: 7613530] - PubMed
Waschbisch 2011
    1. Waschbisch A, Manzel A, Linker RA, Lee D. Vascular pathology in multiple sclerosis: mind boosting or myth busting?. Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine 2011;3(1):7. [PUBMED: PMID: 21756314] - PMC - PubMed
Wattjes 2011
    1. Wattjes MP, Oosten BW, Graaf WL, Seewann A, Bot JC, Berg R, et al. No association of abnormal cranial venous drainage with multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance venography and flow‐quantification study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2011;82(4):429‐35. [PUBMED: PMID: 20980483] - PubMed
Weinshenker 1989
    1. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course. Brain 1989;112(Pt 6):1419‐28. [PUBMED: PMID: 2597989] - PubMed
Weinstock‐Guttman 2011
    1. Weinstock‐Guttman B, Zivadinov R, Cutter G, Tamaño‐Blanco M, Marr K, Badgett D, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal vascular insufficiency is not associated with HLA DRB1*1501 status in multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 2011;6(2):e16802. [PUBMED: PMID: 21340025] - PMC - PubMed
Wu 2011
    1. Wu GF, Alvarez E. The immuno‐pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurologic Clinics 2011;29(2):257‐78. [PUBMED: 21439440] - PMC - PubMed
Yamout 2010
    1. Yamout B, Herlopian A, Issa Z, Habib RH, Fawaz A, Salame J, et al. Extracranial venous stenosis is an unlikely cause of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2010;16(11):1341‐8. [PUBMED: PMID: 21041329] - PubMed
Zamboni 2006
    1. Zamboni P. The Big Idea: iron‐dependent inflammation in venous disease and proposed parallels in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2006;99(11):589‐93. [PUBMED: PMID: 18045150] - PMC - PubMed
Zamboni 2009a
    1. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, Malagoni AM, Gianesini S, Bartolomei I, et al. A prospective open‐label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009;50(6):1348‐58. [PUBMED: PMID: 19958985] - PubMed
Zamboni 2009b
    1. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, Malagoni AM, Tacconi G, Dall’Ara S, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2009;80(4):392–9. - PMC - PubMed
Zamboni 2011
    1. Zamboni P, Menegatti E, Weinstock‐Guttman B, Dwyer MG, Schirda CV, Malagoni AM, et al. Hypoperfusion of brain parenchyma is associated with the severity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross‐sectional preliminary report. BMC Medicine 2011;9:22. [PUBMED: PMID: 21385345] - PMC - PubMed
Zamboni 2012
    1. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Weinstock‐Guttman B, Kennedy C, Salvi F, Zivadinov R. Venous angioplasty in patients with multiple sclerosis: results of a pilot study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2012; Vol. 43, issue 1:116‐22. [PUBMED: PMID: 21839654] - PubMed
Zivadinov 2011a
    1. Zivadinov R, Marr K, Cutter G, Ramanathan M, Benedict RH, Kennedy C, et al. Prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in MS. Neurology 2011;77(2):138‐44. [PUBMED: PMID: 21490322] - PubMed
Zivadinov 2011b
    1. Zivadinov R, Ramanathan M, Dolic K, Marr K, Karmon Y, Siddiqui AH, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: diagnostic, pathogenetic, clinical and treatment perspectives. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2011;11(9):1277‐94. [PUBMED: 21864074] - PubMed
Zivadinov 2014
    1. Zivadinov R, Bastianello S, Dake MD, Ferral H, Haacke EM, Haskal ZJ, et al. International Society for Neurovascular Disease. Recommendations for multimodal non invasive and invasive screening for detection of extracranial venous abnormalities indicative of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a position statement of the International Society for Neurovascular Disease. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR 2014;25(11):1785‐1794.e17. [PUBMED: 25255703] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

van Zuuren 2012
    1. Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Pucci E, Jagannath VA, Robak EW. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in multiple sclerosis patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009903.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms