Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;15(7):e636-e643.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00372. Epub 2019 May 31.

Development and Implementation of a Cancer Quality Index in Queensland, Australia: A Tool for Monitoring Cancer Care

Affiliations

Development and Implementation of a Cancer Quality Index in Queensland, Australia: A Tool for Monitoring Cancer Care

Euan T Walpole et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Oncol Pract. 2019 Aug;15(8):462. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00407. J Oncol Pract. 2019. PMID: 31404514 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: Many cancer-specific assessment tools to measure health care performance have been developed. However, reporting on quality indicators at a population level is uncommon. We describe the development and implementation of a Cancer Quality Index (CQI) and examine the sensitivity of the index to detect change over time.

Methods: In developing the CQI, we reviewed existing indices, guidelines, and cancer care pathways. Our choice of indicators was additionally guided by the availability of population-wide data. A series of pilot indicators underwent trial use and were evaluated, and outcomes were discussed before a final set of indicators was established. The process was overseen by a clinician-led quality assurance committee that included hospital administrators and data custodians.

Results: The CQI includes five quality dimensions and 16 indicators for public and private cancer services using population-wide information. The following are the five indicators: Effective, Efficient, Safe, Accessible, and Equitable. We demonstrated the sensitivity of the CQI to measure change over time by examining outcomes such as time to first treatment and 30-day surgical mortality, using linked cancer registry and health administrative data for 99,728 patients with cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2009 and 2010 and 2014.

Conclusion: The CQI is a valuable tool to track progress in delivering safe, quality cancer care within health care services. Critical to its development and implementation has been the involvement of clinicians from several disciplines and the availability of population-based data. We found the CQI to be a sensitive tool able to detect changes over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources