Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up
- PMID: 31151337
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
Background: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is regarded as an effective treatment option for soft lumbar disc herniation (LDH). There have been few studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of endoscopic procedures compared with conventional surgery.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of TELD compared with those of open lumbar microdiscectomy.
Study design: Between January 2009 and September 2011, 335 consecutive patients with symptomatic LDH were treated with decompressive discectomy, either TELD or open microdiscectomy. Patients were prospectively entered into the clinical database and their records were retrospectively reviewed.
Setting: Hospital and outpatient surgical center.
Methods: Data from 298 patients who were treated with decompressive discectomy, either TELD or open microdiscectomy, were evaluated with a minimum 5-year follow-up period. Among them, 146 patients were treated using TELD (TELD group), and the remaining 152 patients using open microdiscectomy (Open group). Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified Macnab criteria.
Results: The VAS and ODI significantly improved in both groups. The rate of excellent or good outcomes was 88.36% and 87.5% in the TELD and Open group, respectively. The reoperation rate was 4.2% and 3.3% in the TELD and Open group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes; however, operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to work were significantly shorter in the TELD group (P < 0.01).
Limitations: First, the patient selection was not randomized; therefore, the risk of bias might be increased. Second, this study lacks analysis of the radiographic changes related to the degenerative change over the long-term follow-up period.
Conclusions: The long-term results of TELD for soft LDH are comparable to those of conventional open microdiscectomy. The selective endoscopic discectomy technique under local anesthesia provides the typical advantages of minimally invasive procedures such as a shorter operation time, hospital stay, and recovery time.
Key words: Endoscopic, discectomy, hospital stay, lumbar disc, microscopic, operative time, return to work, transforaminal.
Similar articles
-
Radiographic and clinical outcomes of huge lumbar disc herniations treated by transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;185:105485. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105485. Epub 2019 Aug 9. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 31421587
-
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29303471
-
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy versus Open Microdiskectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Comparative Cohort Study on Costs and Long-Term Outcomes.J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;85(6):561-569. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775760. Epub 2023 Oct 25. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 37879346
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30205219
-
Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 5;13(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0868-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29976224 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Surgeons' Perspective, Learning Curve, Motivation, and Obstacles of Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Thailand: Results From A Nationwide Survey.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 11;2022:4971844. doi: 10.1155/2022/4971844. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35309165 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Transforaminal Full Endoscopic Discectomy: Efficacy of the Hand Down Outside-In (HDOI) Technique.J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 25;14(7):679. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070679. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39063933 Free PMC article.
-
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17. Int J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35177530 Free PMC article.
-
Recovery Kinetics After Commonly Performed Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Procedures.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Nov 1;47(21):1489-1496. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004399. Epub 2022 Jul 15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022. PMID: 35867600 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar degenerative diseases: A minimum 6-year follow-up.Front Surg. 2022 Sep 15;9:1004709. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004709. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36189389 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical