Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Aug;28(8):1283-1291.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1291. Epub 2019 May 31.

Urinary Metabolomics to Identify a Unique Biomarker Panel for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Urinary Metabolomics to Identify a Unique Biomarker Panel for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Lu Deng et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Population-based screening programs are credited with earlier colorectal cancer diagnoses and treatment initiation, which reduce mortality rates and improve patient health outcomes. However, recommended screening methods are unsatisfactory as they are invasive, are resource intensive, suffer from low uptake, or have poor diagnostic performance. Our goal was to identify a urine metabolomic-based biomarker panel for the detection of colorectal cancer that has the potential for global population-based screening.

Methods: Prospective urine samples were collected from study participants. Based upon colonoscopy and histopathology results, 342 participants (colorectal cancer, 171; healthy controls, 171) from two study sites (Canada, United States) were included in the analyses. Targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed to quantify 140 highly valuable metabolites in each urine sample. Potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer were identified by comparing the metabolomic profiles from colorectal cancer versus controls. Multiple models were constructed leading to a good separation of colorectal cancer from controls.

Results: A panel of 17 metabolites was identified as possible biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Using only two of the selected metabolites, namely diacetylspermine and kynurenine, a predictor for detecting colorectal cancer was developed with an AUC of 0.864, a specificity of 80.0%, and a sensitivity of 80.0%.

Conclusions: We present a potentially "universal" metabolomic biomarker panel for colorectal cancer independent of cohort clinical features based on a North American population. Further research is needed to confirm the utility of the profile in a prospective, population-based colorectal cancer screening trial.

Impact: A urinary metabolomic biomarker panel was identified for colorectal cancer with the potential of clinical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 (a, b, c, and d)
Figure 1 (a, b, c, and d)
Normalized concentrations of metabolites for controls, CRC-CAD, and CRC-MSK study groups for: a) diacetylspermine; b) HPHPA; c) aspartic acid; and, d) butyric acid.
Figure 2 (a, b, and c)
Figure 2 (a, b, and c)
Results showing: a) separation plot from sPLS-DA with component 1 and component 2; b) variables selected by the sPLS-DA model for a component 1; and c) variables selected by the sPLS-DA model for a component 2.
Figure 3 (Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb)
Figure 3 (Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb)
The ROC curve of: Ia) Model I on training set using 17 metabolites, Ib) Model I on testing set using 17 metabolites, IIa) Model II on training set using 4 metabolites, IIb) Model II on testing set using 4 metabolites, IIIa) Model III on training set using diacetylspermine and kynurenine, and IIIb) Model III on testing set using diacetylspermine and kynurenine.
Figure 4 (a,b)
Figure 4 (a,b)
The normalized concentration trend for a) diacetylspermine and b) kynurenine from controls, to Stage 0, to Stage I, to Stage II, to stage III and to Stage IV.

References

    1. Levin TR, Corley DA, Jensen CD, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Zauber AG, et al. Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population. Gastroenterology 2018;155(5):1383–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dube C Organized screening is better than opportunistic screening at decreasing the burden of colorectal cancer in the United States. Gastroenterology 2018;155(5):1302–4. - PubMed
    1. Navarro M, Nicolas A, Ferrandez A, Lanas A. Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update. World journal of gastroenterology 2017;23(20):3632–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, Schoen RE, Sung JJ, Young GP, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut 2015;64(10):1637–49. - PubMed
    1. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Levin TR, Lavin P, Lidgard GP, et al. Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;370(14):1287–97. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances