Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 6;42(9):zsz129.
doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz129.

Neural reward processing in self-reported short sleepers: examination of gambling task brain activation in the Human Connectome Project database

Affiliations

Neural reward processing in self-reported short sleepers: examination of gambling task brain activation in the Human Connectome Project database

Brian J Curtis et al. Sleep. .

Abstract

Study objectives: Much of what we assume about the effects of short sleep duration on neural reward processing derives from total sleep deprivation studies. Although total sleep deprivation appears rare, habitual short sleep is common: 30% of working US adults report habitually sleeping ≤ 6 hours/night. It remains largely unknown whether habitual short sleepers exhibit similar reward processing brain activation patterns to those observed following total sleep deprivation in prior studies. Therefore, our aim was to test objectively reward processing brain activation patterns associated with self-reported habitual short sleep duration in a large sample.

Methods: Nine hundred and fifty-two adult participants from the Human Connectome Project database were grouped on reported habitual short (≤6 hours) vs. medium-length (7-9 hours) sleep duration using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Reward processing brain activation was examined using a gambling task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Subject-level covariates for age, sex, continuous sleep duration, daytime dysfunction, and PSQI total score are provided as supplemental analyses.

Results: Brain activation patterns revealed expected reward processing-related activation for age and sex. However, activation for sleep duration, dysfunction, and PSQI score did not correspond to those evident in previous total sleep deprivation studies.

Conclusions: Self-reported short sleep duration, perceived sleep-related dysfunction, and sleep quality via PSQI do not appear to be meaningfully associated with activation in well-described regions of the human neurobiological reward circuit. As these findings are counter to prior results using experimental sleep deprivation, future work focused on more direct comparisons between self-reported sleep variables and experimental sleep deprivation appears warranted.

Keywords: habitual short sleep duration; fMRI; reward processing; total sleep deprivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Brain activation in self-reported short sleepers and medium-length sleepers during gambling fMRI win and loss trials. (A) Short sleeper win trials. (B) Medium-length sleeper win trials. (C) Short sleeper loss trials. (D) Medium-length sleeper loss trials. Color-coding indicates group identity (i.e. red = short sleepers; blue = medium-length sleepers).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Differences in brain activation between self-reported short sleepers and medium-length sleepers during gambling fMRI win and loss trials. Colored squares satisfied p < 0.05, uncorrected. No regions were significant for false discovery rate q < 0.05. Color scale represents t-statistic for a two-tailed t-test of brain activation between groups.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Differences in a priori brain regions between self-reported short and medium-length sleepers during gambling fMRI win trials. Two-tailed t-test. Error bars represent standard error from the mean. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Ant, anterior; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; MPF, medial prefrontal cortex. d = Cohen’s d effect size estimates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hirshkowitz M, et al. .. National Sleep Foundation’s updated sleep duration recommendations: final report. Sleep Heal. 2015;1(4):233–243. - PubMed
    1. Luckhaupt SE, et al. .. The prevalence of short sleep duration by industry and occupation in the National Health Interview Survey. Sleep. 2010;33(2):149–159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Essen DC, et al. .. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage. 2013;80:62–79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis BJ, et al. .. Sleep duration and resting fMRI functional connectivity: examination of short sleepers with and without perceived daytime dysfunction. Brain Behav. 2016;6(12):e00576. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grandner MA, et al. .. Pack AI. Problems associated with short sleep: bridging the gap between laboratory and epidemiological studies. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14(4):239–247. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types