Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul:116:186-191.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 7.

Diagnostic value of lung ultrasound in evaluating the severity of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Affiliations

Diagnostic value of lung ultrasound in evaluating the severity of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Houqing Pang et al. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: It is still unclear whether lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to evaluate the severity of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS).

Objective: To evaluate the role of LUS in assessing NRDS.

Methods: From January 2017 to January 2018, newborns with suspected NRDS were enrolled. The LUS score and lung consolidation areas were determined. The receiver operative curve (ROC) was used to analyze the LUS score and lung consolidation to predict NRDS severity.

Results: Neonates with NRDS had higher LUS scores than those with non-NRDS (23.6 ± 3.6 vs. 16.2 ± 1.8, P < 0.05). Among neonates with NRDS, the LUS scores increased with NRDS severity (18.0 ± 2.7 vs. 24.0 ± 1.7 vs. 27.0 ± 1.7, all P < 0.05). There were almost no consolidation areas in non-NRDS, while 1.9 ± 1.7 consolidation areas were observed in the NRDS group (P < 0.05). The number of consolidation areas also increased with NRDS severity (0 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 4.1 ± 1.3, all P < 0.05). The LUS score for NRDS vs. non-NRDS showed 80.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity using a cut-off of 21.5 (Area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.938; P < 0.001). The LUS score for severe vs. mild/moderate NRDS showed 73.1% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity using a cut-off of 25.5 (AUC = 0.944; P < 0.001). The LUS score for predicting mechanical ventilation showed 81.3% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity using a cut-off of 25.5 (AUC = 0.912; P < 0.001). The AUCs of consolidation areas were similar to those of LUS score (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The LUS score and consolidation areas can discriminate NRDS from non-NRDS and the different grades of NRDS, and predict the application of mechanical ventilation.

Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; Lung ultrasound; Mechanical ventilation; Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources