The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) and the risk of recurrent thrombosis: Results from the APS ACTION cohort
- PMID: 31153708
- PMCID: PMC7402528
- DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.04.009
The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) and the risk of recurrent thrombosis: Results from the APS ACTION cohort
Abstract
Objectives: To assess whether patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and history of recurrent thrombosis have higher levels of adjusted Global AntiphosPholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) when compared to patients without recurrent thrombosis.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients, we identified APS patients with a history of documented thrombosis from the AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance For Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Clinical Database and Repository ("Registry"). Data on aPL-related medical history and cardiovascular risk factors were retrospectively collected. The aGAPSS was calculated at Registry entry by adding the points corresponding to the risk factors: three for hyperlipidemia, one for arterial hypertension, five for positive anticardiolipin antibodies, four for positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies and four for positive lupus anticoagulant test.
Results: The analysis included 379 APS patients who presented with arterial and/or venous thrombosis. Overall, significantly higher aGAPSS were seen in patients with recurrent thrombosis (arterial or venous) compared to those without recurrence (7.8 ± 3.3 vs. 6 ± 3.9, p<0.05). When analyzed based on the site of the recurrence, patients with recurrent arterial, but not venous, thrombosis had higher aGAPSS (8.1 ± SD 2.9 vs. 6 ± 3.9; p<0.05).
Conclusions: Based on analysis of our international large-scale Registry of aPL-positive patients, the aGAPSS might help risk stratifying patients based on the likelihood of developing recurrent thrombosis in APS.
Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Cardiovascular; GAPSS; Risk stratification; Thrombosis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2006. February [cited 2016 Jul 4];4(2):295–306. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16420554 - PubMed
-
- Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. GAPSS: the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score. Rheumatology (Oxford) [Internet]. 2013. August [cited 2016 Sep 21];52(8):1397–403. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23315788 - PubMed
-
- Sciascia S, Radin M, Sanna G, Cecchi I, Roccatello D, Bertolaccini ML. Clinical utility of the global anti-phospholipid syndrome score for risk stratification: a pooled analysis. Rheumatology [Internet]. 2018;(January):1–5. Available from: http://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rheumat... - DOI - PubMed
-
- Massimo Radin, Karen Schreiber, Irene Cecchi, Roccatello Dario CMJ and SS. The risk of ischaemic stroke in primary APS patients: a prospective study. Eur J Neurol. 2017;Accepted F. - PubMed
-
- Radin M, Ugolini-Lopes MR, Sciascia S, Andrade D. Extra-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: Risk assessment and management. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; - PubMed
