A Threshold of Meaning for Work Disability Improvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
- PMID: 31154634
- PMCID: PMC6702614
- DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-0155-5
A Threshold of Meaning for Work Disability Improvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
Abstract
Introduction: The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) is used to assess the impact of an intervention on work productivity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Unfortunately, studies reporting changes or improvements in domains of WPAI:SHP by patients with PsA have a limited threshold of meaning due to the absence of published minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Our objective was to determine the MCIDs for improvement in WPAI:SHP in patients with active PsA.
Methods: MCIDs for WPAI:SHP domains (presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment) were derived for patients with active PsA who were biologic naïve or TNF inhibitor (TNFi) experienced using 24-week results from two phase 3 trials (SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2). MCIDs were derived using the anchor-based method supplemented by the distribution-based method. Anchors included achievement of the American College of Rheumatology 20 responder index (ACR20), the minimal disease activity (MDA), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Disability Index (HAQ-DI) MCID (improvement ≥ 0.35). Anchor validity was assessed by biserial correlation and analysis of covariance modeling against the domains. MCIDs were triangulated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method supplemented by the distribution-based method.
Results: The analyses included 417 biologic-naïve and 363 TNFi-experienced patients. ACR20, MDA, and HAQ-DI were valid anchors. Significant differences in WPAI:SHP domain scores were observed between patients achieving ACR20, MDA, or HAQ-DI compared to patients not achieving these clinical thresholds (all P < 0.001). ROC analyses suggested that a ≥ 20% improvement in presenteeism, a 15% improvement in work productivity loss, and a 20% improvement in activity impairment represented clinically meaningful improvements in both populations. The distribution-based method supported the results.
Conclusion: MCIDs for the presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment domains were estimated to be 20%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, in biologic-naïve or TNFi-experienced PsA populations. These results will help improve the meaningfulness of WPAI:SHP improvements reported by PsA patients.
Trial registration: SPIRIT-P1: NCT01695239, SPIRIT-P2: NCT02349295.
Funding: Eli Lilly and Company.
Keywords: Biologic naïve; Psoriatic arthritis; TNFi experienced; WPAI; Work productivity.
Conflict of interest statement
William TIllett has received grants/speaker fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Chen-Yen Lin is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. Julie Birt is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. Art Zbrozek is retired and a former employee of Eli Lilly and Company.
Figures
References
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
