Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;23(3):156-160.
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000735. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

Assistance of family carers for patients with COPD using nebulisers at home: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Assistance of family carers for patients with COPD using nebulisers at home: a qualitative study

Bothaina Alhaddad et al. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May.

Abstract

Objective: For many patients with chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the assistance of family carers with medicines is vital for optimal treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the assistance carers provide to patients with COPD using nebuliser-delivered therapy at home, and the problems experienced that may impact on the safety and effectiveness of therapy and contribute to carer burden.

Methods: A cross-sectional, qualitative descriptive study was conducted with participants recruited from primary and intermediate care. Home interviews were conducted with 14 carers who assisted a family member with COPD using a nebuliser. Qualitative procedures enabled analysis of nebuliser-related activities and problems experienced by carers.

Results: The carer sample included 10 female and 4 male carers, with a mean age of 61 years: 11 spouses and 3 daughters. They had assisted patients with use of their nebuliser and associated medications for, on average, 4.5 years. Assistance ranged from taking full responsibility for nebuliser use to providing help with particular aspects only when required. Nebuliser-related activities included assembling and setting up equipment, mixing medicines, operating the device, dismantling and cleaning equipment. Difficulties were described with all aspects of care. Carers reported concerns about medication side effects and the lack of information provided.

Conclusions: The study revealed the vital role of carers in enabling effective therapy. The wide-ranging responsibilities assumed by carers and problems experienced relate to all aspects of COPD management with nebulisers, and have a potential impact on treatment outcomes and carer burden. A systematic approach to addressing carers' needs and prioritising support would be anticipated to have positive consequences for patients, carers and health services.

Keywords: COPD; family caregivers; medicines optimisation; nebulisers; pharmaceutical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Family carers who assist patients with COPD with nebulisers: potential impact on treatment outcomes and carer burden.

References

    1. British Thoracic Society. Current best practice for nebuliser treatment. British Thoracic Society Nebuliser Project Group. Thorax 1997;52(Suppl 2):S1–106. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. London, UK: National Clinical Guideline Centre, 2010.
    1. Alhaddad B, Smith FJ, Robertson T, et al. . Patients’ practices and experiences of using nebuliser therapy in the management of COPD at home. BMJ Open Respir Res 2015;2:e000076 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teale C, Jones A, Patterson CJ, et al. . Community survey of home nebulizer technique by elderly people. Age Ageing 1995;24:276–7. 10.1093/ageing/24.4.276 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barta SK, Crawford A, Roberts CM. Survey of patients’ views of domiciliary nebuliser treatment for chronic lung disease. Respir Med 2002;96:375–81. 10.1053/rmed.2001.1292 - DOI - PubMed