Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;23(3):171-176.
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000767. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on length of stay in an acute admission unit: a cluster randomised study

Affiliations

Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on length of stay in an acute admission unit: a cluster randomised study

Katrine Brodersen Lind et al. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Physicians in acute admission units (AAUs) are obliged to obtain medication history and perform medication reconciliation, which is time consuming and often incomplete. Studies show that clinical pharmacists (CPs) can obtain accurate medication histories, but so far no studies have investigated the effect of this on time measures. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of a CP intervention on length of stay (LOS) in an AAU.

Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, cluster randomised study. Weekdays were randomised to control or intervention. CP intervention consisted of obtaining medication history and performing medication reconciliation and review. The primary outcome was LOS in the AAU. Secondary outcomes were other time-related measures-for example, physicians' self-reported time spent on medication topics. Finally, the number of documented medications per patient was established.

Results: 232 and 216 patients, respectively, were included on control (n=63) and intervention (n=63) days. The mean LOS was 342 (95% CI 323 to 362) min in the intervention group and 339 (95% CI 322 to 357) min in the control group, which was not statistically significantly different. Physicians spent on average 4.3 (95% CI 3.7 to 5.0) min in the intervention group and 7.5 (95% CI 6.6 to 8.5) min in the control group, corresponding to an overall reduction of 43.0% (95% CI 30.9% to 53.0%, p<0.001). The number of documented medications per patient was 10.0 (intervention group) and 8.8 (control group).

Conclusions: This study indicates that LOS in the AAU was not affected by CP intervention; however, physicians reported a significant reduction in time spent on medication topics.

Trial registration number: Clinical Trial Gov: 1-16-02-379-13.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; CLINICAL PHARMACY; Length of stay; acute admission unit; medication history conduction; medication reconcilliation; medication review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of the patient's stay in the acute admission unit. The physician’s duties regarding medication treatment (dotted area) were performed by the clinical pharmacist (CP) in the intervention group. LOS, length of stay.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow of both clusters and patients due to the cluster randomised design. The top part illustrates the exclusion of clusters and patients outside the intervention shifts. The bottom part illustrates the exclusion of patients due to exclusion criteria and lack of time. 1Exclusion criteria: triage red: 3.3%; <18 years, 2.0%; <4 medications, 45.7%; terminal or detoxified, 1.2%; unable to give informed consent, 11.0%; referred for acute outpatient clinic, 2.6%; other reason—for example, referred to emergency department or medication already approved by physician, 12.7%. 2Lack of time covers two scenarios: (1) physician interviewed patients before informed consent was obtained; (2) triage was not finish before 4.30pm (16:30), so there was not enough time for informed consent to be obtained and possibly intervention to be carried out before end of shift.

References

    1. Sun BC, Hsia RY, Weiss RE, et al. . Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61:605–11.e6. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy ML, Zeger SL, Ding R, et al. . Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency department length of stay, even among high-acuity patients. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:492–503.e4. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forster AJ, Stiell I, Wells G, et al. . The effect of hospital occupancy on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:127–33. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00029.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basey AJ, Krska J, Kennedy TD, et al. . Prescribing errors on admission to hospital and their potential impact: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:17–25. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001978 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Winter S, Spriet I, Indevuyst C, et al. . Pharmacist- versus physician-acquired medication history: a prospective study at the emergency department. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:371–5. 10.1136/qshc.2009.035014 - DOI - PubMed