Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;23(4):233-238.
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000877. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy: a pharmacist's perspective

Affiliations
Review

Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy: a pharmacist's perspective

Priya Mistry et al. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in conjunction with cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancy and highlight the challenges this provides for the hospital pharmacist.

Methods: A literature search for relevant articles was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The following keywords and phrases were used: 'hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy', 'early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy', 'carrier solutions' and 'cytoreductive surgery'. Local experience was also shared, referencing national guidelines and published literature.

Results: The rationale behind intraperitoneal chemotherapy is to directly administer drugs into the peritoneal cavity and achieve exposure of higher concentrations of cytotoxic agents to tumour nodules within the abdomen and on peritoneal surfaces for a prolonged period of time, without significant systemic toxicity. This has been widely demonstrated in intraoperative and early postoperative settings. Hydrophilic chemotherapy drugs with high molecular weights and permeable to the peritoneum, but slow plasma clearance create high concentrations of the drug in the peritoneal cavity, with lower systemic circulation. Commonly used drugs include mitomycin C, oxaliplatin, cisplatin, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil. Newer drugs such as the taxanes and bevacizumab have also shown promise. Heat increases drug penetration into body tissues and destroys tumour cells directly by causing damage to cells that have inherently faulty heat regulation pathways and also increases the cytotoxic effect of selected chemotherapeutic agents. Optimal temperature for hyperthermic intraperitoneal drug administration is between 41 and 43°C in a carrier solution that is compatible with the drug chosen. For early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy high molecular weight starch carrier solutions prolong intraperitoneal dwell time and exposure of drug to tumour cells. Drugs are administered intraoperatively with the abdomen open or closed for between 30 and 120 min depending on the drug chosen and local protocols. Drug doses are traditionally calculated using body surface area. Toxicity such as neutropenia is encountered far less than with systemic chemotherapy.

Conclusions: This paper discusses the rationale for intraperitoneal drug administration following cytoreductive surgery and describes appropriate drug selection, methods of drug delivery and potential challenges in the use of the intraperitoneal route. It provides evidence and practical guidance for hospital pharmacists who may be involved in the surgical management of peritoneal malignancy particularly in dose calculation, preparation and administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Keywords: CHEMOTHERAPY; PHARMACOKINETICS AND DYNAMICS; SURGERY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy being administered using a typical hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy machine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The open technique (‘Coliseum’) for intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration.

References

    1. Kerscher AG, Chua TC, Gasser M, et al. . Impact of peritoneal carcinomatosis in the disease history of colorectal cancer management: a longitudinal experience of 2406 patients over two decades. Br J Cancer 2013;108:1432–9. 10.1038/bjc.2013.82 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sugarbaker PH. Peritonectomy procedures. Surg Clin North Am 2003;12:703–27. 10.1016/S1055-3207(03)00048-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Youssef H, Newman C, Chandrakumaran K, et al. . Operative findings, early complications, and long-term survival in 456 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome of appendiceal origin. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:293–9. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318202f026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohamed F, Cecil T, Moran B, et al. . A new standard of care for the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. Curr Oncol 2011;18:e84–96. 10.3747/co.v18i2.663 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Complete cytoreduction for pseudomyxoma peritonei (Sugarbaker technique):IPG56 2004. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg56 (accessed 12/09/2015).