Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;24(4):213-217.
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000905. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

Inpatient prescribing systems used in NHS Acute Trusts across England: a managerial perspective

Affiliations

Inpatient prescribing systems used in NHS Acute Trusts across England: a managerial perspective

Katherine Shemilt et al. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The individualised patient prescription chart, either paper or electronic, is an integral part of communication between healthcare professionals. The aim of this study is to ascertain the extent to which different prescribing systems are used for inpatient care in acute hospitals in England and explore chief pharmacists' opinions and experiences with respect to electronic prescribing and medicines administration (EPMA) systems.

Method: Audio-recorded, semistructured telephone interviews with chief pharmacists or their nominated representatives of general acute hospital trusts across England.

Results: Forty-five per cent (65/146) of the chief pharmacists agreed to participate. Eighteen per cent (12/65) of the participants interviewed stated that their trust had EPMA systems fully or partially implemented on inpatient wards. The most common EPMA system in place was JAC (n=5) followed by MEDITECH (n=3), iSOFT (n=2), PICS (n=1) and one in-house created system. Of the 12 trusts that had EPMA in place, 4 used EPMA on all of their inpatient wards and the remaining 8 had a mixture of paper and EPMA systems in use. Fifty six (86% 56/65) of all participants had consulted the standards for the design of inpatient prescription charts. From the 12 EPMA interviews qualitatively analysed, the regulation required to provide quality patient care is perceived by some to be enforceable with an EPMA system, but that this may affect accuracy and clinical workflow, leading to undocumented, unofficial workarounds that may be harmful.

Conclusions: The majority of inpatient prescribing in hospital continues to use paper-based systems; there was significant diversity in prescribing systems in use. EPMA systems have been implemented but many trusts have retained supplementary paper drug charts, for a variety of medications. Mandatory fields may be appropriate for core prescribing information, but the expansion of their use needs careful consideration.

Keywords: PHARMACY MANAGEMENT (ORGANISATION, FINANCIAL); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electronic prescription chart functionalities provided by the electronic prescribing and medicines administration (EPMA) software (n=12). Multilevel control for prescribers—the EPMA system can limit prescribing depending on prescriber experience or specialty.

References

    1. National Prescribing Centre. Improving quality in prescribing. 2012. http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140627111521/http://www.n...
    1. Goundrey-Smith S. Principles of electronic prescribing. London: Springer, 2008.
    1. Cornford T, Dean B, Savage I, et al. Electronic prescribing in hospitals-challenges and lessons learned. Leeds: NHS Connecting for Health, 2009.
    1. Crooks J, Weir RD, Coull DC, et al. Evaluation of a method of prescribing drugs in hospital, and a new method of recording their administration. Lancet 1967;1:668–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)92557-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gommans J, McIntosh P, Bee S, et al. Improving the quality of written prescriptions in a general hospital: the influence of 10 years of serial audits and targeted interventions. Intern Med J 2008;38:243–8. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01518.x - DOI - PubMed