Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 15;14(2):150-152.
doi: 10.5009/gnl19047.

Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Resection: Current Status and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Resection: Current Status and Future Directions

Hung Leng Kaan et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

Therapeutic endoscopic resection has gained favor for its ability to achieve high en bloc and histologically complete resection rates via a minimally invasive approach. The main technical difficulties faced by interventionists are first the lack of traction causing suboptimal visualization of the dissection field and second, the lack of triangulation using existing therapeutic apparatuses. These challenges can be overcome with the use of robots and the multiple degrees of freedom afforded by the robotic wrists. Nevertheless, complications such as bleeding and perforation can occur. It is hence beneficial for the robotic device to be equipped with additional abilities such as suturing. Once the robotic prototypes have been fully optimized and marketed, a structured program should be instituted to ensure proper and adequate training of the end-users. The future of robotics should then explore the possibility of developing a soft robot or a robot with more natural human-like movements. A robot with a force feedback mechanism would be superior and improve safety. Eventually, a supervised autonomous robot may perform interventions with greater precision and accuracy than an expert procedurist. This review describes the benefits of robot-assisted endoscopic resections, recent developments aimed at managing iatrogenic complications and future directions for robotic endoscopy.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Endoscopy; Robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

K.Y.H. is the co-founder of EndoMaster Pte Ltd., Singapore. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Saito Y, Sumiyama K, Chiu PW. Robot assisted tumor resection devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14:657–662. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1358087. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ASGE; SAGES. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashrafian H, Clancy O, Grover V, Darzi A. The evolution of robotic surgery: surgical and anaesthetic aspects. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:i72–i84. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phee SJ, Low SC, Huynh VA, Kencana AP, Sun ZL, Yang K. Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1192–1195. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333413. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong JY, Ho KY. Robotics for advanced therapeutic colonoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2018;51:552–557. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed