Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 31;8(6):775.
doi: 10.3390/jcm8060775.

Nutritional Laboratory Markers in Malnutrition

Affiliations
Review

Nutritional Laboratory Markers in Malnutrition

Ulrich Keller. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Serum visceral proteins such as albumin and prealbumin have traditionally been used as markers of the nutritional status of patients. Prealbumin is nowadays often preferred over albumin due to its shorter half live, reflecting more rapid changes of the nutritional state. However, recent focus has been on an appropriate nutrition-focused physical examination and on the patient's history for diagnosing malnutrition, and the role of inflammation as a risk factor for malnutrition has been more and more recognized. Inflammatory signals are potent inhibitors of visceral protein synthesis, and the use of these proteins as biomarkers of the nutritional status has been debated since they are strongly influenced by inflammation and less so by protein energy stores. The current consensus is that laboratory markers could be used as a complement to a thorough physical examination. Other markers of the nutritional status such as urinary creatinine or 3-methylhistidine as indicators of muscle protein breakdown have not found widespread use. Serum IGF-1 is less influenced by inflammation and falls during malnutrition. However, its concentration changes are not sufficiently specific to be useful clinically as a marker of malnutrition, and serum IGF-1 has less been used in clinical trials. Nevertheless, biomarkers of malnutrition such as prealbumin may be of interest as easily measurable predictors of the prognosis for surgical outcomes and of mortality in severe illnesses.

Keywords: IGF-1; albumin; biomarkers; elderly; inflammation; malnutrition; nutritional assessment; prealbumin; prognostic marker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Kondrup J., Rasmussen H.H., Hamberg O., Stanga Z. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): A new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin. Nutr. 2003;22:321–336. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poulia K.-A., Yannakoulia M., Karageorgou D., Gamaletsou M., Panagiotakos D.B., Sipsas N.V., Zampelas A. Evaluation of the efficacy of six nutritional screening tools to predict malnutrition in the elderly. Clin. Nutr. 2012;31:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mueller C., Compher C., Ellen D.M. ASPEN Clinical Guidelines. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2011;35:16–24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110389335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen G.L. Malnutrition and Inflammation—“Burning Down the House”. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2015;39:56–62. doi: 10.1177/0148607114529597. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkland L.L., Kashiwagi D.T., Brantley S., Scheurer D., Varkey P. Nutrition in the hospitalized patient. J. Hosp. Med. 2013;8:52–58. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1969. - DOI - PubMed