Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):452.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5849-0.

Breast cancer PAM50 signature: correlation and concordance between RNA-Seq and digital multiplexed gene expression technologies in a triple negative breast cancer series

A C Picornell  1 , I Echavarria  2 , E Alvarez  3 , S López-Tarruella  4 , Y Jerez  4 , K Hoadley  5 , J S Parker  5 , M Del Monte-Millán  4 , R Ramos-Medina  4 , J Gayarre  4 , I Ocaña  4 , M Cebollero  6 , T Massarrah  4 , F Moreno  7 , J A García Saenz  7 , H Gómez Moreno  8 , A Ballesteros  9 , M Ruiz Borrego  10 , C M Perou  11 , M Martin  12
Affiliations

Breast cancer PAM50 signature: correlation and concordance between RNA-Seq and digital multiplexed gene expression technologies in a triple negative breast cancer series

A C Picornell et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Full RNA-Seq is a fundamental research tool for whole transcriptome analysis. However, it is too costly and time consuming to be used in routine clinical practice. We evaluated the transcript quantification agreement between RNA-Seq and a digital multiplexed gene expression platform, and the subtype call after running the PAM50 assay in a series of breast cancer patients classified as triple negative by IHC/FISH. The goal of this study is to analyze the concordance between both expression platforms overall, and for calling PAM50 triple negative breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in particular.

Results: The analyses were performed in paraffin-embedded tissues from 96 patients recruited in a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized neoadjuvant triple negative breast cancer trial (NCT01560663). Pre-treatment core biopsies were obtained following clinical practice guidelines and conserved as FFPE for further RNA extraction. PAM50 was performed on both digital multiplexed gene expression and RNA-Seq platforms. Subtype assignment was based on the nearest centroid classification following this procedure for both platforms and it was concordant on 96% of the cases (N = 96). In four cases, digital multiplexed gene expression analysis and RNA-Seq were discordant. The Spearman correlation to each of the centroids and the risk of recurrence were above 0.89 in both platforms while the agreement on Proliferation Score reached up to 0.97. In addition, 82% of the individual PAM50 genes showed a correlation coefficient > 0.80.

Conclusions: In our analysis, the subtype calling in most of the samples was concordant in both platforms and the potential discordances had reduced clinical implications in terms of prognosis. If speed and cost are the main driving forces then the preferred technique is the digital multiplexed platform, while if whole genome patterns and subtype are the driving forces, then RNA-Seq is the preferred method.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Multiplexed gene expression; PAM50; RNA-Seq; Triple negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.M.P is an equity stock holder, consultant, and Board of Director Member, of BioClassifier LLC. C.M.P is also listed an inventor on patent applications on the Breast PAM50 assay. J.S.P is an inventor on patent applications on the Breast PAM50 assay.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PAM50 subtype calls by technique. Barplot represents counts of samples per subtype and technique. The cross table shows in detail the discordances between both platforms
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Separate centroid correlation when NanoString nCounter® and RNA-Seq platforms are compared. The blue line represents the linear regression. The grey area surrounding it represents the confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Correlation of the correlation to the centroids in both platforms obtained in the PAM50 subtype classifier
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation of ROR and ROR + PS and their associated Bland-Altman plots in both platforms. The upper/lower dashed lines in the Bland-Altman plots represent the mean difference +/− 1.96 * standard deviation. The central dashed line represents the mean difference
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Normalized gene expression levels for each gene contained in the PAM50 assay. The log2 normalized counts for RNA-Seq are represented in the X-axis and those for NanoString nCounter® are represented in the Y-axis. The red line represents the LOWESS smoother, which uses locally weighted polynomial regression
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747–752. doi: 10.1038/35021093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(19):10869–10874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS, Marron JS, He X, Qaqish BF, et al. The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genomics. 2006;7(1):96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-96. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1160–1167. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gnant M, Filipits M, Greil R, Stoeger H, Rudas M, Bago-Horvath Z, et al. Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(2):339–345. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt494. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances