Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar;33(2):203-210.
doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 31.

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Y Zayed et al. Aust Crit Care. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NES) on prevention of critical care myopathy and its effect on various clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Review methods used: This study involved systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NES (applied to different muscle groups combined with usual care) and usual care (passive and active exercises along with early mobilisation and rehabilitation). Included studies enrolled adult patients managed in the ICU for medical or surgical diseases who were or were not mechanically ventilated. The primary outcome was global muscle strength measured by the Medical Research Council grading system. Secondary outcomes included ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and ICU length of stay. Risk ratio for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Data source: A search in major electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, from inception to November 2018 was carried out.

Results: Six RCTs were included, representing 718 patients. The mean age 60 ± 15.3 years, and 60.6% were male. There was no significant difference between NES and usual care on global muscle strength measured by Medical Research Council grading system (MD: 0.45; 95% CI: -2.89 to 3.80; p = 0.79), ICU mortality (risk ratio: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.95-1.78; p = 0.10), duration of MV (days) (MD: -2.07; 95% CI: -5.06 to 0.92; p = 0.18), or ICU length of stay (days) (MD: -3.06; 95% CI: -9.79 to 3.68; p = 0.37) in comparison with the usual therapy alone in critically ill patients.

Conclusion: NES combined with usual care was not associated with significant differences in global muscle strength, ICU mortality, duration of MV, or ICU length of stay in comparison with usual care alone in critically ill patients. Further RCTs are needed to determine patients with maximum benefit and to examine NES safety and efficacy.

Keywords: ICU-acquired weakness; Meta-analysis; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; critical care myopathy; critically ill patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources