Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):dmm037721.
doi: 10.1242/dmm.037721.

Anti-tumour effects of antimicrobial peptides, components of the innate immune system, against haematopoietic tumours in Drosophila mxc mutants

Affiliations

Anti-tumour effects of antimicrobial peptides, components of the innate immune system, against haematopoietic tumours in Drosophila mxc mutants

Mayo Araki et al. Dis Model Mech. .

Abstract

The innate immune response is the first line of defence against microbial infections. In Drosophila, two major pathways of the innate immune system (the Toll- and Imd-mediated pathways) induce the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) within the fat body. Recently, it has been reported that certain cationic AMPs exhibit selective cytotoxicity against human cancer cells; however, little is known about their anti-tumour effects. Drosophila mxcmbn1 mutants exhibit malignant hyperplasia in a larval haematopoietic organ called the lymph gland (LG). Here, using RNA-seq analysis, we found many immunoresponsive genes, including those encoding AMPs, to be upregulated in these mutants. Downregulation of these pathways by either a Toll or imd mutation enhanced the tumour phenotype of the mxc mutants. Conversely, ectopic expression of each of five different AMPs in the fat body significantly suppressed the LG hyperplasia phenotype in the mutants. Thus, we propose that the Drosophila innate immune system can suppress the progression of haematopoietic tumours by inducing AMP gene expression. Overexpression of any one of the five AMPs studied resulted in enhanced apoptosis in mutant LGs, whereas no apoptotic signals were detected in controls. We observed that two AMPs, Drosomycin and Defensin, were taken up by circulating haemocyte-like cells, which were associated with the LG regions and showed reduced cell-to-cell adhesion in the mutants. By contrast, the AMP Diptericin was directly localised at the tumour site without intermediating haemocytes. These results suggest that AMPs have a specific cytotoxic effect that enhances apoptosis exclusively in the tumour cells.

Keywords: AMPs; Cytotoxicity; Drosophila; Fat body; Innate immunity; Lymph gland.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Hyperplasia of the larval LG in mxcmbn1 larvae. (A) Schematic of the LG in Drosophila 3rd instar larvae. The lobes are defined as clusters of haematopoietic cells arranged in a hemispheric pattern aligned segmentally in pairs along the A-P axis of the gland and comprise a larger primary (1st) lobe, a secondary (2nd) lobe and a tertiary (3rd) lobe. The 1st lobe consists of a cortical zone (CZ), medullary zone (MZ) and posterior signalling centre (PSC). At the posterior end of these lobes, a cluster of connected pericardial cells (PCs) are lined in a row. (B) DAPI-stained whole LG isolated from normal control. Normal control LG is arranged bilaterally so that it flanks the dorsal vessel at the midline. (C) DAPI-stained whole lobes with part of the PC row isolated from hemizygous larvae (mxcmbn1/Y) for mxcmbn1. LG tumour overgrowth is visible in the mxcmbn1 mutant larva. The anterior lobes are more prominently enlarged. (D) Quantification of tumour size. The right or left halves of whole LG regions of the mutant LGs (mean=0.266 mm2, n=35) are five times larger than those of normal control (mean=0.047 mm2, n=21) (Welch's t-test, ****P<0.0001). Error bars represent s.e.m.; red horizontal lines represent the mean. (E-H) Hyperplasia and abnormal distribution of differentiated cells labelled by Hml>GFP (E,F) and undifferentiated haemocyte precursors labelled by upd3>GFP (G,H). GFP fluorescence images of LGs prepared from normal control (E,G) and mxcmbn1 mutant larvae (F,H) at mature 3rd instar stage. Magenta, DAPI staining; green, GFP fluorescence. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Activation of two innate immune pathways in the mxcmbn1 mutant. The relative mRNA levels of the target genes of innate immune pathways in control (w/Y) larvae, tumour-harbouring larvae hemizygous for mxcmbn1 and larvae hemizygous for non-tumourous mxcG43are shown as quantified by qRT-PCR. The mRNA levels for samples were normalised to control values. Error bars represent s.e.m. Drs and Def are controlled by the Toll pathway. Dpt is regulated by the Imd pathway. Mtk, AttA and CecA2 are controlled by both the Toll and Imd pathways. Notably, all six AMP genes are specifically upregulated in the mxcmbn1 mutant larvae.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Enhancement of AMP expression in the mxcmbn1 mutant. (A,B,E,F) Bright-field images of control (w/Y) (A,E) and mxcmbn1 (B,F) whole larvae. (C,D,G,H,I,J,K,L) Bright-field images of the larval fat bodies around the salivary glands from the control (C,G,I,K) and mxcmbn1 (D,H,J,L) larvae, raised on normal diet (A-H) or on a diet containing antibiotics (I-L). (A′,B′) Fluorescence images of whole larvae carrying Drs-YFP in control (A′) and mxcmbn1 (B′). (C′,D′) Fluorescence images of larval fat bodies carrying Drs-YFP from control (C′) and mxcmbn1 larvae (D′). Notably, Drs-YFP was induced in fat bodies of the mxcmbn1 mutant, but not in the control. (E′,F′) Fluorescence images of the whole larvae carrying Dpt-YFP in control (E′) and mxcmbn1(F′). (G′,H′) Fluorescence images of larval fat bodies caring Dpt-YFP from control (G′) and mxcmbn1 larvae (H′). Notably, Dpt-YFP was also induced in fat bodies of the mxcmbn1 mutant, but not in control. (I′-L′) Fluorescence images of larval fat bodies carrying Drs-YFP (I′,J′) or Dpt-YFP (K′,L′) from control (I′,K′) and mxcmbn1 larvae (J′,L′). Notably, Drs-YFP and Dpt-YFP were also induced in fat bodies of the mxcmbn1 larvae raised under aseptic conditions. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Overexpression of innate immune pathway components suppresses LG tumour overgrowth. (A-G) LGs stained with DAPI from mature larvae at 3rd instar stage showing a control larva (w/Y) (A), an mxcmbn1 larva (B), LGs from mxcmbn1 larvae overexpressing GFP (C) or Dl (D) by Lsp2-Gal4, or LGs from mxcmbn1 larvae overexpressing GFP (E), Tl10B (constitutively active form of Toll) (F) or Rel.68 (constitutively active form of Rel) (G). (H) Quantification of tumour size (Welch's t-test, n.s. not significant, ****P<0.0001). Error bars represent s.e.m. The horizontal red lines represent the mean. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Fat body-specific induction of AMP genes that are targets of innate immunity pathways in mxcmbn1 larvae. (A-H) LGs stained with DAPI from a control (r4-Gal4/+) larva (A), from mxcmbn1 mutant larvae (B) or from mxcmbn1 larvae expressing GFP (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>GFP) (C), Drs (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Drs) (D), Def (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Def) (E), Dpt (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Dpt) (F), Mtk (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Mtk) (G) and AttA (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>AttA) (H). (I) Quantification of tumour size (Welch's t-test, n.s. not significant, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001). The error bars represent s.e.m. The horizontal red lines represent the mean. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Observation of LG cells undergoing apoptosis in mxcmbn1 larvae overexpressing AMPs in the fat bodies. (A-G,I-N) Cell Event Caspase-3/7 Detection Reagent assays in LGs (A-G), wing and haltere discs (I-K), and eye discs (L-N). Red signals in A-G and I-N, and white signals in A′-G′ and I′-N′, represent cells containing activated caspases. Blue, DAPI staining. (A-G) Fluorescence of LG. (A-C,A′-C′) Control LG expressing Drs (r4>Drs) (A,A′), Def (r4>Def) (B,B′) and Dpt (r4>Dpt) (C,C′). Notably, no apoptotic signals are evident. LGs of mxcmbn1 larvae expressing GFP (D,D′), Drs (E,E′), Def (F,F′) and Dpt (G,G′) in their fat bodies. The LG of mxcmbn1 contains many apoptotic signals (B,B′). LGs of mxcmbn1 larvae overexpressing Drs (C,C′), Def (D,D′) and Dpt (E,E′) show more apoptotic signals than mxcmbn1 larvae. (H) Proportion of apoptotic area in total LG area (Welch's t-test, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). The error bars represent s.e.m. Red horizontal lines represent the mean. (I-K) Fluorescence of wing and haltere discs. (L-N) Fluorescence of eye discs. No apoptotic signals can be seen in the wing and haltere discs or eye discs in the control larvae overexpressing Drs or Dpt genes in their fat bodies. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Anti-PH3 immunostaining of LGs from mature larvae to visualise mitotic cells. (A-C′) LGs from 3rd instar larvae at a mature stage. A whole LG from normal control larva (A), whole LG lobes from r4>Def (B) and whole LG lobes from r4>Dpt (C). (D-F) Anterior lobes of LGs from mxcmbn1 larvae (D), mxcmbn1 overexpressing Def (E) and mxcmbn1 overexpressing Dpt (F) at mature 3rd instar stage. Magenta, DAPI staining; green, anti-PH3 (Ser10) immunostaining. (G) Percentage of the area occupied by PH3-positive cells in LG lobes within the total area of LG lobes (except pericardial cells). The error bars represent s.e.m. Red horizontal lines represent the mean. (Welch's t-test; n.s., not significant, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001). Scale bar: 100 μm.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Visualisation of AMP on LGs and in circulating haemocytes from normal control and mxcmbn1 larvae overexpressing AMPs. (A-L″) Localisation on LGs of AMPs fused with HA-tag showing control LG (r4>Drs) (A,B), LGs from mxcmbn1 overexpressing Drs (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Drs) (C,D), control LG (r4>Def) (E,F), LGs from mxcmbn1 overexpressing Def (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Def) (G,H), control LG (r4>Dpt) (I,J) and LGs from mxcmbn1 overexpressing Dpt (mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Dpt) (K,L). (A,C,E,G,I,K) Red, DE-cadherin (Cad); green, AMP (Drosomycin, Defensin or Diptericin); blue (G), DAPI staining. (B,D,F,H,J,L) High-magnification views (of boxed areas in A,C,E,G,I,K, respectively), showing the DNA (magenta) and AMP (green) in the pericardial cells. AMPs are often localised on regions exhibiting reduced DE-cadherin immunostaining signals. Drosomycin and Defensin appear to be taken into haemocyte-like cells (D,H), whereas Diptericin is associated with the LG in a fibrous shape (H). Scale bars: 50 μm.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Accumulation of AMPs in circulating haemocytes from normal control and mxcmbn1 larvae overexpressing AMPs in their fat bodies. (A-L‴) The cellular localisation of AMPs fused with a HA-tag in circulating haemocytes immunostained with anti-P1 antibody. Two typical examples of the haemocytes are shown for each genotype. (A-D) Circulating haemocytes from larvae overexpressing HA-tagged Def in their fat bodies, control (r4>Def) (A,B) and mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Def (C,D). (E-H) Circulating haemocytes from larvae overexpressing HA-tagged Drs in their fat bodies, control larvae (r4>Drs) (E,F) and mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Drs (G,H). (I-L) Circulating haemocytes from larvae overexpressing HA-tagged Dpt in their fat bodies, control (r4>Dpt) (I,J) and mxcmbn1/Y; r4>Dpt (K,L). Red, anti-HA immunostaining to recognise each AMP; green, anti-P1 immunostaining to recognise circulation plasmatocytes; blue, DAPI staining. (M) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity of anti-HA immunostaining images from larvae overexpressing Defensin, Drosomycin and Diptericin. Student's t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. The error bars represent s.e.m. The horizontal red lines represent the mean. Scale bars: 10 μm.

References

    1. Agaisse H., Petersen U.-M., Boutros M., Mathey-Prevot B. and Perrimon N. (2003). Signaling role of hemocytes in Drosophila JAK/STAT-dependent response to septic injury. Dev. Cell 5, 441-450. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00244-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arefin B., Kucerova L., Krautz R., Kranenburg H., Parvin F. and Theopold U. (2015). Apoptosis in hemocytes induces a shift in effector mechanisms in the drosophila immune system and leads to a pro-inflammatory state. PLoS ONE 10, e0136593 10.1371/journal.pone.0136593 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arefin B., Kunc M., Krautz R. and Theopold U. (2017). The Immune phenotype of three Drosophila leukemia models. G3 (Bethesda) 7, 2139-2149. 10.1534/g3.117.039487 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker M. A., Maloy W. L., Zasloff M. and Jacob L. S. (1993). Anticancer efficacy of Magainin2 and analogue peptides. Cancer Res. 53, 3052-3057. - PubMed
    1. Bangi E., Pitsouli C., Rahme L. G., Cagan R. and Apidianakis Y. (2012). Immune response to bacteria induces dissemination of Ras-activated Drosophila hindgut cells. EMBO Rep. 13, 569-576. 10.1038/embor.2012.44 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms