Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;62(7):1123-1128.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4904-3. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

Continuous glucose monitoring targets in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: every 5% time in range matters

Affiliations

Continuous glucose monitoring targets in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: every 5% time in range matters

Helen R Murphy. Diabetologia. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

With randomised trial data confirming that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is associated with improvements in maternal glucose control and neonatal health outcomes, CGM is increasingly used in antenatal care. Across pregnancy, the ambition is to increase the CGM time in range (TIR), while reducing time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR) and glycaemic variability measures. Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes currently spend, on average, 50% (12 h), 55% (13 h) and 60% (14 h) in the target range of 3.5-7.8 mmol/l (63-140 mg/dl) during the first, second and third trimesters, respectively. Hyperglycaemia, as measured by TAR, reduces from 40% (10 h) to 33% (8 h) during the first to third trimester. A TIR of >70% (16 h, 48 min) and a TAR of <25% (6 h) is achieved only in the final weeks of pregnancy. CGM TBR data are particularly sensor dependent, but regardless of the threshold used for individual patients, spending ≥4% of time (1 h) below 3.5 mmol/l or ≥1% of time (15 min) below 3.0 mmol/l is not recommended. While maternal hyperglycaemia is a well-established risk factor for obstetric and neonatal complications, CGM-based risk factors are emerging. A 5% lower TIR and 5% higher TAR during the second and third trimesters is associated with increased risk of large for gestational age infants, neonatal hypoglycaemia and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. For optimal neonatal outcomes, women and clinicians should aim for a TIR of >70% (16 h, 48 min) and a TAR of <25% (6 h), from as early as possible during pregnancy.

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Hyperglycaemia; Pregnancy; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kristensen K, Ögge LE, Sengpiel V et al (2019) Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study of 186 pregnancies. Diabetologia. 10.1007/s00125-019-4850-0 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2347–2359. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Battelino T, Danne T, Amiel SA et al (2019) Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time-in-range. Diabetes Care (In press) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kilpatrick ES. HbA1c measurement. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(4):344–345. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2003.010918. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Radder JK, van Roosmalen J. HbA1c in healthy, pregnant women. Neth J Med. 2005;63(7):256–259. - PubMed