Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Aug;47(8):1125-1134.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003848.

Intracranial Hypertension and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Insults in Adult Hypertensive Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Occurrence and Associations With Outcome

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intracranial Hypertension and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Insults in Adult Hypertensive Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Occurrence and Associations With Outcome

Wendy C Ziai et al. Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Elevated intracranial pressure and inadequate cerebral perfusion pressure may contribute to poor outcomes in hypertensive intraventricular hemorrhage. We characterized the occurrence of elevated intracranial pressure and low cerebral perfusion pressure in obstructive intraventricular hemorrhage requiring extraventricular drainage.

Design: Prospective observational cohort.

Setting: ICUs of 73 academic hospitals.

Patients: Four hundred ninety-nine patients enrolled in the CLEAR III trial, a multicenter, randomized study to determine if extraventricular drainage plus intraventricular alteplase improved outcome versus extraventricular drainage plus saline.

Interventions: Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure were recorded every 4 hours, analyzed over a range of thresholds, as single readings or spans (≥ 2) of readings after adjustment for intracerebral hemorrhage severity. Impact on 30- and 180-days modified Rankin Scale scores was assessed, and receiver operating curves were analyzed to identify optimal thresholds.

Measurements and main results: Of 21,954 intracranial pressure readings, median interquartile range 12 mm Hg (8-16), 9.7% were greater than 20 mm Hg and 1.8% were greater than 30 mm Hg. Proportion of intracranial pressure readings from greater than 18 to greater than 30 mm Hg and combined intracranial pressure greater than 20 plus cerebral perfusion pressure less than 70 mm Hg were associated with day-30 mortality and partially mitigated by intraventricular alteplase. Proportion of cerebral perfusion pressure readings from less than 65 to less than 90 mm Hg and intracranial pressure greater than 20 mm Hg in spans were associated with both 30-day mortality and 180-day mortality. Proportion of cerebral perfusion pressure readings from less than 65 to less than 90 mm Hg and combined intracranial pressure greater than 20 plus cerebral perfusion pressure less than 60 mm Hg were associated with poor day-30 modified Rankin Scale, whereas cerebral perfusion pressure less than 65 and less than 75 mm Hg were associated with poor day-180 modified Rankin Scale.

Conclusions: Elevated intracranial pressure and inadequate cerebral perfusion pressure are not infrequent during extraventricular drainage for severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and level and duration predict higher short-term mortality and long-term mortality. Burden of low cerebral perfusion pressure was also associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes and may be more significant than intracranial pressure. Adverse consequences of intracranial pressure-time burden and cerebral perfusion pressure-time burden should be tested prospectively as potential thresholds for therapeutic intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A, Mean of maximum daily ICP readings (with 95% CIs). B, Mean of minimum daily CPP readings (with 95% CIs). Maximum daily ICP was not significantly different between survivors and non-survivors at day 30. Minimum daily CPP was significantly lower in non-survivors versus survivors on days 1–5 and 7 (*:p<0.05). The slopes between groups are not different; however, the slope for ICP in survivors is significantly different from zero (p<0.001).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Visualization of correlation between outcomes and average time at observed CPP threshold levels. A, Day 180 mortality (n = 499). B, Day 180 poor mRS (n = 499). Each color-coded point in the graph refers to a probability of the outcome, defined by a certain CPP threshold (Y-axis), and a certain duration (X-axis). Dark pink/blue areas mean that such CPP events, on average, are associated with higher probability of worse outcome (or death)/good outcome (mRS 4–6/0–3).

References

    1. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al.: Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015; 46:2032–2060 - PubMed
    1. Ropper AH, King RB: Intracranial pressure monitoring in comatose patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 1984; 41:725–728 - PubMed
    1. Janny P, Papo I, Chazal J, et al.: Intracranial hypertension and prognosis of spontaneous intracerebral haematomas. A correlative study of 60 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1982; 61:181–186 - PubMed
    1. Fernandes HM, Siddique S, Banister K, et al.: Continuous monitoring of ICP and CPP following ICH and its relationship to clinical, radiological and surgical parameters. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2000; 76:463–466 - PubMed
    1. Ziai WC, Melnychuk E, Thompson CB, et al.: Occurrence and impact of intracranial pressure elevation during treatment of severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1601–1608 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances