Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Sep;47(9):1184-1193.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003807.

A Multicenter Study of the Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Expectations About Prognosis by Surrogate Decision-Makers in ICUs

Douglas B White  1 , Shannon Carson  2 , Wendy Anderson  3 , Jay Steingrub  4 , Garrett Bird  5 , J Randall Curtis  6 , Michael Matthay  7 , Michael Peterson  8 , Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk  9 , Anne-Marie Shields  1 , Natalie Ernecoff  9 , Kaitlin Shotsberger  10 , Lisa Weissfeld  11 , Chung-Chou H Chang  9 , Francis Pike  12 , Bernard Lo  13 , Catherine L Hough  14
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A Multicenter Study of the Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Expectations About Prognosis by Surrogate Decision-Makers in ICUs

Douglas B White et al. Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Optimistic expectations about prognosis by surrogate decision-makers in ICUs are common, but there are few data about the causes and clinical consequences. Our objective was to determine the causes of optimistic expectations about prognosis among surrogates and whether it is associated with more use of life support at the end of life.

Design: Prospective, multicenter cohort study from 2009 to 2012.

Setting: Twelve ICUs from multiple regions of the United States.

Subjects: The surrogates and physicians of 275 incapacitated ICU patients at high risk of death.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Surrogates and physicians completed a validated instrument assessing their prognostic expectations for hospital survival. We determined the proportion of surrogates with optimistic expectations, defined as a prognostic estimate that was at least 20% more optimistic than the physician's, then determined how frequently this arose from surrogates miscomprehending the physicians' prognosis versus holding more hopeful beliefs compared with the physician. We used multivariable regression to examine whether optimistic expectations were associated with length of stay, stratified by survival status, and time to withdrawal of life support among nonsurvivors. Overall, 45% of surrogates (95% CI, 38-51%) held optimistic expectations about prognosis, which arose from a combination of misunderstanding the physician's prognostic expectations and from holding more hopeful beliefs compared with the physician. Optimistic expectations by surrogates were associated with significantly longer duration of ICU treatment among nonsurvivors before death (β coefficient = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.05-0.83; p = 0.027), corresponding to a 56% longer ICU stay. This difference was associated with a significantly longer time to withdrawal of life support among dying patients whose surrogates had optimistic prognostic expectations compared with those who did not (β coefficient = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.16-1.07; p = 0.009).

Conclusions: The prevalent optimism about prognosis among surrogates in ICUs arises both from surrogates' miscomprehension of physicians' prognostications and from surrogates holding more hopeful beliefs. This optimism is associated with longer duration of life support at the end of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.. Outcome Measure to Assess Surrogates’ Perceptions of Prognosis
What do you think are the chances that your family member will survive this hospitalization if the current plan of care stays the same? Place a mark on the line to indicate your estimate.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. Jama. 2003;290(6):790–797. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):638–643. - PubMed
    1. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(4):1163–1167. - PubMed
    1. Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211–1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):3044–3049. - PubMed

Publication types