Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 15;6(4):47.
doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040047.

Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect

Affiliations

Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect

Florian Schmitz et al. J Intell. .

Abstract

Research suggests that the relation of mental speed with working memory capacity (WMC) depends on complexity and scoring methods of speed tasks and the type of task used to assess capacity limits in working memory. In the present study, we included conventional binding/updating measures of WMC as well as rapid serial visual presentation paradigms. The latter allowed for a computation of the attentional blink (AB) effect that was argued to measure capacity limitations at the encoding stage of working memory. Mental speed was assessed with a set of tasks and scored by diverse methods, including response time (RT) based scores, as well as ex-Gaussian and diffusion model parameterization. Relations of latent factors were investigated using structure equation modeling techniques. RT-based scores of mental speed yielded substantial correlations with WMC but only weak relations with the AB effect, while WMC and the AB magnitude were independent. The strength of the speed-WMC relation was shown to depend on task type. Additionally, the increase in predictive validity across RT quantiles changed across task types, suggesting that the worst performance rule (WPR) depends on task characteristics. In contrast to the latter, relations of speed with the AB effect did not change across RT quantiles. Relations of the model parameters were consistently found for the ex-Gaussian tau parameter and the diffusion model drift rate. However, depending on task type, other parameters showed plausible relations as well. The finding that characteristics of mental speed tasks determined the overall strength of relations with WMC, the occurrence of a WPR effect, and the specific pattern of relations of model parameters, implies that mental speed tasks are not exchangeable measurement tools. In spite of reflecting a general factor of mental speed, different speed tasks possess different requirements, supporting the notion of mental speed as a hierarchical construct.

Keywords: attentional blink; mental speed; response time modeling; working memory capacity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Scatterplots and correlations across participants of model implied and observed RTs for five quantiles (0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 0.90) of the RT distribution.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Diffusion model for binary decision tasks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Paradigm and (b) Attentional Blink (AB) effect.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Latent Correlations of a Mental Speed General Factor with WMC and AB.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlations of RT Bands obtained in Mental Speed Tasks with WMC and AB. Factor (CFA) corresponds with a latent factor obtained in a confirmatory factor analysis using the three stimulus materials as observed indicators.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Parameters of the ex-Gaussian parameterization fitted to the Substitution tasks as predictors of WMC and AB. Significant parameters are displayed in black font.

References

    1. Carroll J.B. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY, USA: 1993.
    1. Kyllonen P.C., Christal R.E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity. Intelligence. 1990;14:389–433. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1. - DOI
    1. Ackerman P.L., Beier M.E., Boyle M.D. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2002;131:567–589. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.4.567. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danthiir V., Wilhelm O., Schulze R., Roberts R.D. Factor structure and validity of paper-and-pencil measures of mental speed: Evidence for a higher-order model? In: Wilhelm O., Engle R.W., editors. Intelligence. Volume 33. Elsevier Science; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2005. pp. 491–514.
    1. Danthiir V., Wilhelm O., Roberts R.D. Further evidence for a multifaceted model of mental speed: Factor structure and validity of computerized measures. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2012;22:324–335. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.010. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources