Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters
- PMID: 31162809
- DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13069
Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters
Abstract
Introduction: The Sysmex XN-10 automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation) is routinely used in hematology laboratories to perform complete blood cell count with differential (CBC w/ diff). The sensitivity of this system for blast detection is unclear, since many prior studies evaluating the blast flagging capabilities of Sysmex XN series used the white precursor cell (WPC) channel, which is not cleared for use in the United States.
Methods: We assessed the blast flagging capabilities of the Sysmex XN-10 compared with CellaVision (a cell image analyzer)-assisted visual hematology results. We evaluated the following flags: "blasts?/abnormal lymph?" and "immature granulocytes present" and compared differences in turnaround time between methods.
Results: We collected data on 2239 CBC w/ diff Sysmex automated analyzer differential and CellaVision-assisted visual differential from the inpatient hematology-oncology population of a tertiary care medical center. Solely analyzing the first CBC/diff from each unique patient, both flags had a combined sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 50.2%, PPV of 21.7%, and NPV of 100%. The mean turnaround time for the automated differential was 19.5 minutes (SD 35.9 minutes) compared with 66.4 minutes for the CellaVision-assisted visual differential (SD 68.5 minutes; P < 0.001; Figure 1).
Conclusion: The Sysmex XN-10 abnormal lymphocyte/blast and immature granulocytes flags had excellent sensitivity and acceptable specificity in detecting circulating blasts with shorter turnaround time than the CellaVision-assisted visual differential. Our study suggests that automated differentials performed on Sysmex XN-10 can replace visual differentials as a first-line screening method for blast detection with improved turnaround time in hematology-oncology populations.
Keywords: Cellavision; Sysmex XN; blast; cell image analysis; leukemia.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of abnormal cell flagging of the hematology analyzers Sysmex XN and Sysmex XE-5000 in oncohematologic patients.Int J Lab Hematol. 2017 Feb;39(1):58-67. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12575. Epub 2016 Dec 16. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017. PMID: 27981789
-
Performance evaluation of Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in umbilical cord blood: a comparison study with Sysmex XE-2100.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Dec;52(12):1771-9. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0392. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014. PMID: 24978899
-
Performance evaluation of the white cell precursor channel on the Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in HIV specimens.J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 May;32(4):e22335. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22335. Epub 2017 Sep 26. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018. PMID: 28948641 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.Clin Lab Med. 2002 Mar;22(1):279-97. doi: 10.1016/s0272-2712(03)00075-1. Clin Lab Med. 2002. PMID: 11933579 Review.
-
[Automated hematology analysers and spurious counts Part 2. Leukocyte count and differential].Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2012 Mar-Apr;70(2):141-54. doi: 10.1684/abc.2012.0665. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2012. PMID: 22484525 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Favorable correlation between neutrophil percentages obtained using automated hematology analyzers and microscopic examinations in malignant lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy.Ann Hematol. 2025 Apr;104(4):2305-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06313-1. Epub 2025 Mar 20. Ann Hematol. 2025. PMID: 40111499 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular signatures between citrus and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus.PLoS Pathog. 2021 Dec 9;17(12):e1010071. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010071. eCollection 2021 Dec. PLoS Pathog. 2021. PMID: 34882744 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Performance evaluation of the new Sysmex XR-Series haematology analyser.Pract Lab Med. 2024 Feb 15;39:e00370. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00370. eCollection 2024 Mar. Pract Lab Med. 2024. PMID: 38404527 Free PMC article.
-
Flagging performance of two automated hematology analyzers in blast cell screening.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Oct;9(20):1606. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-5238. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34790812 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Detection of Lung Cancer Cell Profiles in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes Using a Hematological Analyzer and Flow Cytometry Method.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;17(3):431. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030431. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39941799 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ryan DH. Examination of blood cells. In Kaushansky K, Lichtman MA, Prchal JT, Levi MM, Press OW, Burns LJ, Caligiuri M, eds. Williams Hematology (9th edn). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2016:11-26.
-
- Vajpayee N, Graham S, Bem S. Basic examination of blood and bone marrow. In McPherson R, Pincus M, eds. Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods (23rd edn). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2017:510-539.
-
- Briggs CJ, Linssen J, Longair I, Machin SJ. Improved flagging rates on the Sysmex XE-5000 compared with the XE-2100 Reduce the number of manual film reviews and increase laboratory productivity. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:309-316.
-
- Hotton J, Broothaers J, Swaelens C, Cantinieaux B. Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:845-852.
-
- Eilertsen H, Hagve T. Do the flags related to immature granulocytes reported by the Sysmex XE-5000 warrant a microscopic slide review? Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;142:553-560.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials