Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Jan;32(1):114-126.
doi: 10.1111/den.13457. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic masses: A prospective multicenter study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic masses: A prospective multicenter study

Shigetaka Yoshinaga et al. Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions has high diagnostic yield. However, few prospective multicenter studies have been performed. We performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.

Methods: This prospective cohort study involved five hospitals in Japan. The primary outcome was sensitivity of EUS-FNA for diagnosing malignant lesions. We also evaluated parameters of diagnostic sufficiency and the safety of EUS-FNA.

Results: In total, 246 patients were enrolled. The absolute values of the parameters evaluated showed no significant differences; however, the percentage changes in the white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels after examination were significantly higher, and the percentage change in hemoglobin concentrations was significantly lower. The minor and major complication rates at the time of puncture, 24 h, 7 days and 28 days were 4.1%, 2.8%, 1.6%, and 0.0%, respectively. The true complication rate was 1.2%. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 97.2%, 88.0%, 96.2%, 100%, and 81.4%, respectively.

Conclusions: EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic lesions has high diagnostic yield and is safe, consistent with previously studies.

Keywords: complication; diagnostic sensitivity; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; prospective cohort study; solid pancreatic lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1992; 38: 172-3.
    1. Yamao K, Sawaki A, Mizuno N et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB): past, present, and future. J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 40: 1013-23.
    1. Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig. Endosc. 2011; 23(Suppl 1): 29-33.
    1. Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJW, Possamai L et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: 319-31.
    1. Fritscher-Ravens A, Izbicki JR, Sriram PV et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology extending the indication for organ-preserving pancreatic surgery. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 2255-60.