Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 4;11(6):511.
doi: 10.3390/v11060511.

Cell Density Effects in Different Cell Culture Media and Their Impact on the Propagation of Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus

Affiliations

Cell Density Effects in Different Cell Culture Media and Their Impact on the Propagation of Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus

Veronika Dill et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is endemic in many parts of the world. Vaccination is an important control measure, limits viral spread, and can help to eradicate the disease. However, vaccination programs are cost-intensive because of the short shelf life of vaccines and the need for frequent re-vaccination. Animal-component-free (ACF) or chemically defined media (CDM) at high cell densities are a promising approach for the production of inexpensive high-quality vaccines, but the occurrence of cell density effects has been reported for various virus-cell systems in vaccine production. For FMDV, the use of CDM or ACF media for vaccine production has not been studied and no information about cell density effects is available. This work describes the propagation of FMDV in ACF or in CDM. Cells were grown at increasing cell densities and either 100% media exchange or addition of 30% fresh media was performed before infection with FMDV. Increasing cell densities reduced the viral titer and increased yield variability in all media except BHK300G. This effect can be mitigated by performing a 100% media exchange before infection or when using the controlled environment of a bioreactor. The media composition and also a fragile relationship between virus and cell metabolism seem to be causal for that phenomenon.

Keywords: animal-component-free media; antifoam; cell density; chemically defined media; foot-and-mouth disease virus; suspension cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.B. and M.E. declare that they have no competing interests. The project, including V.D.’s salary, was funded by Merck Life Sciences. A.Z. and J.E. are employees of Merck Life Sciences. Merck Life Sciences participated in the design of the study, as well as in the collection and analysis of the data and the final review of the manuscript. The funders had no role in the interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Impact of antifoam in the cell culture media on viral yield in infected cultures and cell viability in the absence of infection. Antifoam was added to the media at a final concentration of 0.03, 0.3, 1.7 or 3.3% (v/v). A culture with no additives served as a control. (a) Cells at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL were infected with Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) O SAU/18/2018 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 and the viral harvest at 20 hpi is shown as log10 TCID50/mL. (b) Antifoam was added to non-infected cells (1 × 106 cells/mL) and cell viability was measured after 20 h of culturing. Experiments were performed three times independently. Significance code: “****” p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cell density experiments in spin tubes and 3L-single-use bioreactors with different cell culture media for cell growth. Cells were grown in (a,d) the animal-component-free (ACF) media BHK200 or in the CDM (b,e) BHK300B and (c,f) BHK300G in three different cell densities (1 × 106/2 × 106/3 × 106 cells/mL). A media exchange of either 100% or addition of 30% fresh media was performed before infection with FMDV A24 Cruzeiro (panels ac) or O/SAU/18/2015 (panels df) at a MOI of 0.01. The final virus titers in log10 TCID50/mL of the spin tube experiments are colored in blue, while the results of the bioreactor runs are shaded in red. Significance code: “**” p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Virus growth in cell culture media with different contents of conditioned media in spin tubes. Cells were grown in the (a) ACF media BHK200 and in the chemically defined media (CDM) (b) BHK300B and (c) BHK300G in two different cell densities (1 × 106 cells/mL: blue; 3 × 106 cells/mL: red). Different percentages of 0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% and 100% conditioned media were applied before viral infection with FMDV O/SAU/18/2015 at a MOI of 0.01. Significance code: “****” p ≤ 0.0001, “***” p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Increase or decrease of the cell density relative to the starting cell density. Increase or decrease in cell density after 20 h of viral infection at a cell density of (a) 1 × 106 cells/mL or (b) 3 × 106 cells/mL. Values were calculated from the values recorded in the experiment described above (Figure 3).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cellular phenotype during batch cultivation. Cellular parameters such as (a) viable cell density (VCD) in cells/mL, (b) percent viability and (c) average diameter in µm were evaluated for BHK200 (orange), BHK300B (violet) and BHK300G (blue). Highlighted in white is the period of time in which viral infection and cellular virus production would take place at cell densities of 1 × 106 cells/mL or 3 × 106 cells/mL.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Calcium consumption of cells during batch analysis. Cells were grown in BHK200 (orange), BHK300B (violet) or BHK300G (blue) with either 100% medium supplementation or addition of 30% fresh medium.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jamal S.M., Belsham G.J. Foot-and-mouth disease: Past, present and future. Vet. Res. 2013;44:1–14. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samuel A.R., Knowles N.J. Foot-and-mouth disease virus: Cause of the recent crisis for the UK livestock industry. Trends Genet. Tig. 2001;17:421–424. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02374-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brito B.P., Rodriguez L.L., Hammond J.M., Pinto J., Perez A.M. Review of the Global Distribution of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus from 2007 to 2014. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017;64:316–332. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12373. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doel T.R. FMD vaccines. Virus Res. 2003;91:81–99. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00261-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parida S. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus: Strategies and effectiveness. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2009;8:347–365. doi: 10.1586/14760584.8.3.347. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources